Add high-throughput J2K/HTJ2K batch decoding#54
Merged
Conversation
jcwal1516
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 22, 2026 04:24
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
j2k-mlas a thin Burn allocation and device-interop adapterWhy
Medical training pipelines need high-throughput Gray/RGB integer decoding without routing decoded GPU pixels through host memory. HTJ2K is the primary optimized path while classic JPEG 2000 remains covered.
Validation
Performance status
Full grayscale passes the staged comparison on the M4 Pro: 1.431x geometric-mean speedup at batch 1 and 2.338x at batch 8. Larger color batches accelerate, but RGB/RGBA batch 1 and 8 remain slower than staged CPU decode/upload. Those rows stay explicitly selectable and are not presented as universally accelerated.