Bind a number on both sides, and never to a bound word - #2
Merged
Conversation
A number that leaned back on the word before it gave up its forward bind, so `cost 0.05 ms` was free to break between the measurement and its unit, and `measuring 8 + 13` let the `+` open a line. When the word in front was a bound one, both sides were kept — `the 5 files` — so the same unit came out bound in one clause and split in the next. Now the number is bound on both sides. What it still refuses is a bound word: it does not lean back on one, since the `5` of `the 5 files` belongs to the files rather than to the article, and it does not reach forward to one either, since the `of` in `version 2 of it` is where a number never belonged — the reading 0.1.0 already declined to keep. Fixes #1.
firefoxic
force-pushed
the
bind-a-number-on-both-sides
branch
from
August 30, 2026 17:06
e1de06a to
3136b38
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A number that leaned back on the word before it gave up its forward bind, so
cost 0.05 mswas free to break between the measurement and its unit, andmeasuring 8 + 13let the+open a line. When the word in front was a bound one, both sides were kept —the 5 files— so the same unit came out bound in one clause and split in the next.Now the number is bound on both sides. What it still refuses is a bound word: it does not lean back on one, since the
5ofthe 5 filesbelongs to the files rather than to the article, and it does not reach forward to one either, since theofinversion 2 of itis where a number never belonged — the reading 0.1.0 already declined to keep.On the examples of the report:
cost 0.05 ms togethercost␣0.05␣ms togethermeasuring 8 + 13 = 21 columns:measuring␣8␣+ 13␣= 21␣columns:removed 76 rulesremoved␣76␣rulesversion 2 of itversion␣2 of␣itSee issue 366 for the census.See issue␣366 for␣the␣census.Fixes #1.