Update soap to version 0.19.1 🚀#137
Open
greenkeeperio-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello lovely humans,
soap just published its new version 0.19.1.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of soap.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project ✨
You rock!
🌴
GitHub Release
(#937)
travis-citest support fornode.js<4.x(LTS) (#932)The new version differs by 108 commits .
d3f9875Release v0.19.197e0452Reverting #914 (#937)94a8b54Add test for accepting array as parameter based on wsdl (#933)358c611readme.md clarifications, examples and typos (#930)18c2790Fix build by satisfying jshint indentation (#931)1a440a0Droptravis-citest support fornode.js<4.x(LTS) (#932)14c8a3fUpdate CONTRIBUTING.md14aa52ctypo in server example (#925)bd762ccRelease v0.19.03a1c6e9Fix missing namespace declaration on array if the namespace is already declared with another prefix. (#923)bc6992aFixes spelling error in WSSecurityCert-section. Changed the word 'succefully' to 'successfully' (#917)5dbcb1dadd fields sequence if it's required (need help) (#914)00ec5f1FIX deprecated node-uuid@1.4.7 (#913)54d20e8Only add references for the soap:Body and wsse:Security/Timestamp elements in WSSecurityCert (#911)daa4fb0Fix jshint error. (#909)There are 108 commits in total. See the full diff.