Skip to content

Add emacs-pgtk to ELN - #1483

Merged
yselkowitz merged 1 commit into
fedora-eln:mainfrom
yselkowitz:eln
Aug 21, 2025
Merged

Add emacs-pgtk to ELN#1483
yselkowitz merged 1 commit into
fedora-eln:mainfrom
yselkowitz:eln

Conversation

@yselkowitz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In c10s, the main emacs package provided the pgtk binary. However, in F43+ that is provided by emacs-pgtk, and the main RPM is just a virtual package which pulls in the best subpackage based on the detected environment:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/c/c2d5a811c7177edefe3a9ad8896ad83d8afbb3b5
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/c/e7d0043cec87ffd4eec68cd4e0bf19d9141b38dd

Also, do we really still need emacs-lucid in RHEL?

/cc @lzaoral

@yselkowitz
yselkowitz marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2025 15:58
@lzaoral

lzaoral commented Aug 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ccing @lnykryn (PO) and @jacekmigacz (emacs maintainer)

I'm no longer involved in any PO-related activities (nor am I a member of cs-plumbers).

In c10s, the main emacs package provided the pgtk binary.  However, in F43+
that is provided by emacs-pgtk, and the main RPM is just a virtual
package which pulls in the best subpackage based on the detected environment:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/c/c2d5a811c7177edefe3a9ad8896ad83d8afbb3b5
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/c/e7d0043cec87ffd4eec68cd4e0bf19d9141b38dd
@yselkowitz
yselkowitz merged commit 1d23092 into fedora-eln:main Aug 21, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants