Skip to content

docs: replace obsolete RFC 7231/7235 references with RFC 9110#2669

Open
sriramakanthpendikatla wants to merge 1 commit into
falconry:masterfrom
sriramakanthpendikatla:fix/update-rfc-references
Open

docs: replace obsolete RFC 7231/7235 references with RFC 9110#2669
sriramakanthpendikatla wants to merge 1 commit into
falconry:masterfrom
sriramakanthpendikatla:fix/update-rfc-references

Conversation

@sriramakanthpendikatla

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Closes #2525

Updated obsolete RFC references in the documentation:

  • RFC 7231 → RFC 9110 (HTTP Semantics)
  • RFC 7235 → RFC 9110 (HTTP Semantics)

Updated links from tools.ietf.org to rfc-editor.org
as the canonical source.

Changes

  • docs/user/tutorial.rst: Updated RFC 7231 link to RFC 9110
  • docs/ext/rfc.py: Updated RFC 7231 section reference to RFC 9110

Testing

Documentation-only change. No code behaviour affected.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6566f4a) to head (19d65c4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #2669   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           64        64           
  Lines         7985      7985           
  Branches      1103      1103           
=========================================
  Hits          7985      7985           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update references to obsolete RFCs

1 participant