More templates: connect, swift-scheduling - #1128
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
This PR touches files which potentially affect the outcome of the tests of an exercise. This will cause all students' solutions to affected exercises to be re-tested. If this PR does not affect the result of the test (or, for example, adds an edge case that is not worth rerunning all tests for), please add the following to the merge-commit message which will stops student's tests from re-running. Please copy-paste to avoid typos. For more information, refer to the documentation. If you are unsure whether to add the message or not, please ping |
depial
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
43 and 29 completions, respectively. We can afford to retest. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Continues from #1127.
These were simpler than Bob, though displaying the board in
connecttook a few attempts to get Jinja2 to play nicely withjlfmt.perfect-numbershad an update in #1127, but it turns out that was just a URL change in the documentation. Fortunate, because the current Julia implementation is wildly different from theproblem-specifications. Three separate boolean functions here, versus a single function returning a text classifier incanonical-data. I'm not eager to step into that compatibility minefield.