Add LASSO without structure to LinearRegression notebook#203
Conversation
|
The docs build is failing, I guess because I import graphite-maps? Will copy the imported |
|
Not sure why it fails now. I see no error message... Try running locally |
I see I need Java for the docs? (pandoc) Is there no way around this? From checking the CI I see perhaps I import or use something in the notebook that is not part of the |
| ### Gaussian conditional marginal | ||
|
|
||
| The joint KLD is a natural objective to evaluate model performance on. | ||
| However, multiple (Kalman) ensemble methods only produce an estiamte $K$ either explicit or explicit, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| However, multiple (Kalman) ensemble methods only produce an estiamte $K$ either explicit or explicit, | |
| However, multiple (Kalman) ensemble methods only produce an estimate $K$ either explicit or implicit, |
Not sure I understand this sentence.
Do you mean that several different ensemble methods only produce an estimate of
What do you mean by explicit / implicit?
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <feda.curic@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <feda.curic@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <feda.curic@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <feda.curic@gmail.com>
Showcases how to resolve equinor/ert#6599
I think the case for LASSO is well argued for there. Unfortunately I do not know of any reference papers doing this.
The case for LASSO can be seen e.g. from
Thus it makes sense to improve upon EnKF and ES ++ by doing Monte Carlo + LASSO (or Ridge or similar).