Skip to content

Adding new parameters exclusive for only transmisibility and pore volume - #389

Draft
tayloris wants to merge 7 commits into
equinor:masterfrom
tayloris:Porv_Trans_FlowDiagnostics
Draft

tayloris wants to merge 7 commits into
equinor:masterfrom
tayloris:Porv_Trans_FlowDiagnostics

Conversation

@tayloris

@tayloris tayloris commented Apr 29, 2021 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

With this pull request, I try to make visible the experiments for testing flow diagnostics estimates (hard-coded) in FlowNet.
Here, we impose transmissibility and pore-volume values to a simplified network without imaginary nodes. The idea is to test the estimates from flow diagnostics in FlowNet.


Contributor checklist

  • 🎉 This PR represent a starting point for solving Incorporate an optional network generation that depends on estimates from flow diagnostics  #171.
  • 📜 I have broken down my PR into the following tasks:
    • Create an exclusive transmissibility parameter
    • Create an exclusive pore-volume parameter
    • Create simplified network using FD connectivities (Hard coded)
    • Initialize transmissibility and porvolume from FD (Hard coded)
    • Run ahm considering this two-parameter for in the following order: the Egg model simplified Norne, and Norne.
  • 🤖 I have added tests, or extended existing tests, to cover any new features or bugs fixed in this PR.
  • 📖 I have considered adding a new entry in CHANGELOG.md.
  • 📚 I have considered updating the documentation.

@wouterjdb wouterjdb added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 30, 2021

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants