Skip to content

ci: add tests for Kubernetes 1.37 - #9887

Open
beckcl wants to merge 2 commits into
envoyproxy:mainfrom
beckcl:beck/ci-test-k8s-137
Open

ci: add tests for Kubernetes 1.37#9887
beckcl wants to merge 2 commits into
envoyproxy:mainfrom
beckcl:beck/ci-test-k8s-137

Conversation

@beckcl

@beckcl beckcl commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Shift the test matrix to cover K8s 1.37, the newest K8s release:

https://kubernetes.io/releases/1.37/

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None


PR Checklist

  • Authorship & ownership: Coding agents / AI assistants are welcome, but I have reviewed every change, understand how and why it works, can explain and maintain it, and take full responsibility for this PR. I have not submitted generated output I do not understand.
  • DCO: All commits are signed off (git commit -s). See DCO: Sign your work.
  • [~] API agreed first: If this PR contains API changes (changes under /api), the API was discussed and agreed before the implementation. The API change can be in a separate PR, or in the same PR, but the API must be agreed before implementation. N/A if this PR does not contain API changes.
  • Required checks pass: make generate gen-check, make lint, and the unit-test/coverage build pass. (Flaky e2e failures are not considered breakages, but gen-check, lint, and coverage MUST pass.)
  • Tests added/updated: New/changed code is covered by appropriate tests. N/A if this PR does not contain code changes.
  • Docs: User-facing changes update the docs, either in this PR or a follow-up PR. N/A if this PR does not contain user-facing changes.
  • [~] Release notes: For any non-trivial change, added a release-note fragment under release-notes/current/<section>/<pr-number>-<slug>.md (see release-notes/current/README.md for sections and naming). N/A if this PR does not contain non-trivial changes.
  • Generated files committed: Ran make gen-check and committed the result if API/helm charts/modules changed.
  • Scope & compatibility: The PR is reasonably scoped (no unrelated changes) and preserves backward compatibility, or any breaking change is called out above and documented in release-notes/current/breaking_changes/.
  • Codex review: Requested a Codex review and addressed all of its comments.
  • Copilot review: Requested a Copilot review and addressed all of its comments.

@beckcl
beckcl requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2026 10:25
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for cerulean-figolla-1f9435 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1ec44a3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cerulean-figolla-1f9435/deploys/6a9a7ac406cfb70008106046
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9887--cerulean-figolla-1f9435.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@beckcl
beckcl marked this pull request as draft August 28, 2026 10:26
zirain
zirain previously approved these changes Aug 28, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cd7bb9ad41

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/build_and_test.yaml
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.32%. Comparing base (fc28561) to head (1ec44a3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9887   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.31%   81.32%           
=======================================
  Files         264      264           
  Lines       40967    40967           
=======================================
+ Hits        33314    33317    +3     
+ Misses       7652     7649    -3     
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@beckcl
beckcl force-pushed the beck/ci-test-k8s-137 branch from d2b41fd to 5846db0 Compare August 31, 2026 11:40
@beckcl
beckcl marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2026 11:40
zirain
zirain previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026
@zirain

zirain commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@beckcl can you rebase with main branch?

Clemens Beck added 2 commits September 4, 2026 09:59
* add K8s 1.37 conformance and e2e tests
* drop K8s 1.33 conformance tests
* update compatibility matrix

Signed-off-by: Clemens Beck <mail@beckcl.dev>
ClusterTrustBundle graduated to GA in K8s 1.37. All 1.37
review environments now enable ClusterTrustBundle.

Previously it was tested on K8s 1.33 which introduced
ClusterTrustBundle as beta.

Signed-off-by: Clemens Beck <mail@beckcl.dev>
@beckcl

beckcl commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@beckcl can you rebase with main branch?

@zirain Done!

@zirain

zirain commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@kkk777-7

kkk777-7 commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants