-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
secp256k1: implement ec_pubkey_tweak_mul and ec_pubkey_combine fallbacks #125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kdmukai
wants to merge
2
commits into
diybitcoinhardware:master
Choose a base branch
from
kdmukai:py_secp256k1_pubkey_tweak_mul
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@qlrd, I think this makes sense.
According to PEP 3137:
So at runtime this loop may raise a
TypeError:because
pubmay be abytesobject, which is immutable. In that case the assignment would fail with something like:Looking at the suggested code paths,
ec_pubkey_parse()returns abytesobject:embit/src/embit/util/ctypes_secp256k1.py
Lines 590 to 594 in 49d9004
and that value is passed directly to
ec_pubkey_tweak_mul():embit/src/embit/liquid/transaction.py
Lines 85 to 86 in 49d9004
So this will fail because we are trying to mutate an immutable
bytesobject.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lucas, thank you for your analysis and explanations. I addressed this issue in my commit 7673240. Your feedback is very welcome.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@miketlk, seems like a nice patch adding
_ensure_mutable_key()helper that raisesTypeError.Is way batter then silently just doing
pub = bytearray(pub)inside ofec_pubkey_tweak_mulI also cloned the repo and executed the tests locally and everything seems to be working properly.