Skip to content

Add libbsd as dependency - #75

Closed
Rauldg wants to merge 1 commit into
dfki-ric:masterfrom
Rauldg:add_libbsd_dep
Closed

Add libbsd as dependency #75
Rauldg wants to merge 1 commit into
dfki-ric:masterfrom
Rauldg:add_libbsd_dep

Conversation

@Rauldg

@Rauldg Rauldg commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

needed in the compilation of libzmq with the flags passed

@planthaber

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this should be solved on package_set level internally: https://git.hb.dfki.de/sw-backbone/package_sets/ric-backbone/-/blob/master/libs.autobuild?ref_type=heads#L177 with a depends_on

@Rauldg

Rauldg commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think this should be solved on package_set level internally: https://git.hb.dfki.de/sw-backbone/package_sets/ric-backbone/-/blob/master/libs.autobuild?ref_type=heads#L177 with a depends_on

Sure, that is another way of solving it.

@Rauldg

Rauldg commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think that libbsd is nowhere declared. I this package would be covered in the interaction package set: https://git.hb.dfki.de/Interaction/interaction-package_set/-/merge_requests/5

@Rauldg

Rauldg commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think this should be solved on package_set level internally: https://git.hb.dfki.de/sw-backbone/package_sets/ric-backbone/-/blob/master/libs.autobuild?ref_type=heads#L177 with a depends_on

Sure, that is another way of solving it.

On the other hand, solving it on the package seems to me like a less self-contained solution than tracking the dependency in the manifest.

@planthaber

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes, but it is a dependency of libzmq, when compiled from source with ENABLE_DRAFTS on, rrc itself does not require it.

@Rauldg

Rauldg commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yes, but it is a dependency of libzmq, when compiled from source with ENABLE_DRAFTS on, rrc itself does not require it.

Right, it's a dependency of a dependency. I agree that your solution is better.

@Rauldg Rauldg closed this Aug 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants