rough implementation of a capture filter

[imskyyc]

fix typechecking issues (in possibly the worst way i could think of)

this is untested! i'm still working on this :)

[imskyyc]

opening this up because it is working now!

[devSparkle]

Hi!

Thank you for this awsome contribution! I'm still reviewing, I'd just like to leave a few notes.

1. I've gone ahead and reverted style changes — it was making it difficult to distinguish between styling and code changes, which was hampering review. If you'd like to propose style changes, I'm more than happy to consider them in a seperate commit.
2. Thanks for the added support of the SDK as a Git Submodule! I'll be testing this seperately, and if it checks out cherry-picking the commit onto main.

[imskyyc]

Hi!

Thank you for this awsome contribution! I'm still reviewing, I'd just like to leave a few notes.

1. I've gone ahead and reverted style changes — it was making it difficult to distinguish between styling and code changes, which was hampering review. If you'd like to propose style changes, I'm more than happy to consider them in a seperate commit.
2. Thanks for the added support of the SDK as a Git Submodule! I'll be testing this seperately, and if it checks out cherry-picking the commit onto main.

Apologies for the styling changes, my IDE applied them automatically.

[Asynchronite]

@devSparkle ^

[Asynchronite]

Hey! Thought I'd just drop this here just in case;
With Roblox's 717 release, they introduce more logging "levels", and we would like to implement them into this SDK as soon as possible.
PR #43 already sort of implements this, but it was created before this update was published I believe, so we have to probably change stuff on that front.

Haven't read the PR, maybe this has nothing to do with that, but I did want to say that so you are aware in case this does take a second to be reviewed.

Is this change something you need for one of your projects? If so I can probably get around to it sooner than usual, just need to know if this is an important thing or not.

Thanks for the contribution!

[Asynchronite]

Good catch,
For context, Sentry specifically steers clear of language of this sort, and we are trying to align to their engineering philosophy.

See here: https://develop.sentry.dev/getting-started/inclusive-language/