#161 批量查阅: neutral read-only Query, 首页乙/墨与米 shell, interpretation publication status

[davidqyc]

Implements Issue #161 from the accepted final Design handoff, following the
Coordinator's v2 Builder contract and the dual-audit adjudication
(comment 5553483948).

Do not merge. A fresh independent review is required first: this changes
real interpretation write and readback semantics.

Retrofit classification

Area	Class
CredentialSession, TokenStore, RequestWindowScheduler, VocabularyTargetResolver, PreflightPlanner, WriteExecutor, PhraseCreateCore, ExecutionHistory store, CaptureReviewStore, PendingCaptureInbox	REUSE
Domain, ConfirmationBinding, MaimemoTransport, HTTPTransport, ExecutionReceipt, CompanionViewModel, RehearsalMode	EXTEND
editor / Preview / execution / History / Capture surfaces	MOVE_UI_ONLY
ContentView split into per-route views	SMALL_REFACTOR
AppRouter, QuerySessionStore, QueryReadRunner, Query core, Theme + components	NEW_COMPONENT

No second credential stack, scheduler, resolver, History store, workflow
engine, query language or database was introduced.

What changed

Interpretation publication status (公开 / 未发布) — a value threaded
through the existing chain: preference → Preview snapshot → binding context
→ batch/binding digest → fresh authenticated preflight → request body →
authenticated readback → receipt. Not a new approval stack.

• makePlan's pin to CompanionConstants.status becomes an explicit
  {PUBLISHED, UNPUBLISHED} allowlist; anything else fails closed before a
  digest, body or POST exists.
• matchesIntendedState gains the status dimension, so same text + same tags
  • different status is 更新, never 一致.
• A readback that does not reproduce the approved status is the existing
  intendedStateMismatch → notVerified, and is never retried.
• CompanionConstants.status stays immutable for the phrase/legacy path.
• ExecutionReceipt.interpretationStatus is optional and never backfilled;
  a committed golden pre-change archive proves old receipts still decode.

助记 (notes) read — GET /open/api/v1/notes?voc_id=… on the same
authenticated transport and shared scheduler, from the current first-party
maimemo/memo-api-cli contract. Closed decoder, no mutation route, records
returned whole so Query's counting is a pure projection rather than a change
to shared transport semantics.

Neutral batch Query (read-only) — parser (newline / , / ， only; never
space, -, /; no semicolon in v1), advisory-only request budget derived
from the real scheduler windows, sequential row-major reads with one request
in flight, atomic resolver stage then atomic per-cell completion, stop /
resume / modify / back, local AND filter, detail from already-returned
objects, clipboard copy of the matched subset. Memory only.

One provider operation lane — the scheduler is a rate ledger, not a
single-flight proof, so credential validation, Preview, writes and Query now
take an explicit lane. Tests observe the fake transport's in-flight
high-water mark, not scheduler reservations.

Two-dimensional account identity — Keychain fingerprint plus an authority
generation advanced only by an explicit successful connect / replace /
remove. A background suspension, a same-Token foreground restore, a failed
candidate and a 401 all leave Query truth alone; a deliberate reconnect after
a rejection clears it even with the same Token.

Shell — 首页乙 / 墨与米 as semantic asset-catalog roles with Any / Dark /
Increased-Contrast variants; Settings owns account management; contextual
History filters one store and 清空历史 stays global and says so; Capture
keeps its lifecycle, its 抓词 bar and its three accessibility identifiers,
and accepting replaces the path so .write appears exactly once.

Verification

• 406 unit tests, 10 UI tests, 0 failures (iPhone 17 Pro simulator).
• Home verified visually in light and dark against boards 01-00 and 15-01.
• No real Maimemo mutation, no real Token read or exposed, no iPhone
  Mirroring, no TestFlight build/version/upload change.

UNPUBLISHED_READBACK_ASSUMPTION=unverified_real_account — the first-party
schema and CLI prove the contract, but actual visibility/readback of an
UNPUBLISHED interpretation under the Owner's token is still not physically
proven. Verification is not weakened anywhere: a missing or mismatched
readback fails rather than being treated as success.

Two pre-existing issues repaired

• #176 bumped CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION to 4 but left an assertion pinned
  at 3, so BindingAndExecutionTests could not pass on main. Re-synced the
  assertion; no build/version/upload state changed.
• The Share-join release gate matched 小黑鸟伴侣 by label alone, which now
  also matches Home's header. Tightened to the hittable row.

For the fresh reviewer

Priority attack surfaces are listed in the final Builder report.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[davidqyc]

Physical current-version evidence received before PR adjudication exposes a pre-existing Phrase post-write recovery defect that PR #177 does not currently repair.

Observed flow from Owner video:

• Preview: 5 phrases, 新建 5 / 一致 0 / 阻断 0.
• Execution: 新建成功 1 / 未确认 1 / 未执行 3; stop-after-unconfirmed behavior is correct and must remain.
• Later re-Preview: shipping invoice and factory site both become 阻断 / 无法安全读取例句状态; remaining three stay 新建.
• Maimemo UI independently shows the shipping invoice phrase actually exists with the intended content, so re-Preview recovery is failing on an already-created record rather than truthfully converging to 一致.

Fresh first-party increment: maimemo/memo-api-cli currently defines Phrase.tags as free-form string[], and its official tests use arbitrary tags such as greeting / updated. Current iOS phraseTags(_:) instead rejects any returned tag outside the app's canonical 22 write-preference tags. This is a strong root-cause candidate for a post-create record becoming itemResponseRejected -> READ_FAILED; the Owner UI also shows a 我创建 chip, but we must not assume that exact UI badge is in the API tags array without raw-response proof.

Important separation: outbound/write tag selection may remain restricted to the canonical app tags. The read decoder should not reject an otherwise safe Phrase merely because the provider returns an additional safe tag string that is outside the app's write-preference vocabulary. PhraseRecord.hardMatches does not use tags for write-target identity; tags are an observation layer.

MERGE_GATE=BLOCK_PENDING_PHRASE_POSTWRITE_READ_RECOVERY

Before merge, either prove a different exact root cause or repair the read contract with focused regression coverage. Minimum high-value test: a valid returned phrase with a bounded/safe non-canonical tag must decode and remain classifiable instead of becoming READ_FAILED. Then perform a read-only physical re-Preview on the already-created Owner items; no new Maimemo mutation is needed.

[davidqyc]

Coordinator note: the fresh provider evidence is specifically:

• maimemo/memo-api-cli/src/types/phrase.ts: Phrase.tags is string[] (no closed tag enum).
• maimemo/memo-api-cli/test/commands/phrase.test.ts: provider-owned fixtures create/update valid phrases using tags such as greeting and updated.

Decision impact: canonical 22-tag validation remains appropriate for outbound user preference/write input, but it is too strict as a universal inbound provider phrase decoder contract. Keep those concerns separate in any repair.

[davidqyc]

Physical evidence source is Owner-supplied current-version screen recording + Maimemo screenshot from 2026-09-06. Preserve as external/manual evidence only; do not commit the private recording or screenshots into the repo.

[davidqyc]

Fresh external decision increment for this blocker is complete and decision-relevant: current first-party Maimemo Phrase schema/tests prove inbound tags are not restricted to the app's canonical write-tag set. The repair/review lane may proceed from this frozen evidence; no broad provider research is needed.

[davidqyc]

Physical regression gate — phrase post-write recovery

Owner supplied a current-production physical recording plus Maimemo UI evidence showing a real safety-recovery defect: a phrase batch wrote at least the first two items, but a later Preview classified those already-created items as 阻断 / 无法安全读取例句状态 instead of recovering to 一致.

Fresh first-party Maimemo evidence materially narrows the likely cause: Phrase.tags is an open string[] in the current official memo-api-cli type, and the official phrase integration tests use values such as greeting and updated. The current iOS decoder rejects any inbound phrase tag outside the app's local 22-tag write-preference catalog. That couples outbound preference validation to inbound provider schema and can reject an otherwise valid existing phrase.

This review does not claim the screenshot label 我创建 is definitely a raw API tag; raw payload was not captured. The decoder contract is independently over-restrictive from first-party evidence and must be repaired regardless.

Required repair direction:

• keep the local 22-tag/max-3 rules for what this app lets the user write;
• inbound phrase decoding must accept safe provider-returned string tags without requiring membership in that local catalog;
• keep fail-closed type/control-character/body-size validation;
• preserve hardMatches identity semantics (tags are observations, not phrase identity);
• add a regression proving a matching PUBLISHED phrase with a safe non-local tag decodes and Preview classifies it 一致 rather than READ_FAILED;
• no mutating POST is needed to verify this repair.

MERGE_GATE=BLOCK_PENDING_PHRASE_POSTWRITE_READ_RECOVERY
PHYSICAL_CANARY_AFTER_REPAIR=read-only re-Preview of already-created items; expected first written items -> 一致, never duplicate POST.

[davidqyc]

Repair dispatch checkpoint — 2026-09-06

EXTERNAL_INCREMENT_ROUND=XHN-161-PHRASE-POSTWRITE-RECOVERY-20260906
SEARCH_DATE=2026-09-06
DECISION_ATTACKED=Whether the current post-write re-Preview block is a provider-visibility problem or an app-side read/decoder recovery defect.
FRESH_EXTERNAL_SOURCE=https://github.com/maimemo/memo-api-cli/blob/main/src/types/phrase.ts ; https://github.com/maimemo/memo-api-cli/blob/main/test/commands/phrase.test.ts
NEW_EXTERNAL_FACT=Current first-party Phrase.tags is an open string[] and official tests use safe tag strings such as greeting/updated outside this app's local 22-tag write-preference catalog.
LOCAL_CURRENT_FACT=Current iOS phrase decoder rejects inbound tags unless every tag belongs to that 22-tag local catalog; PhraseRecord.hardMatches itself does not use tags for phrase identity.
DECISION_IMPACT=Run a narrow same-branch repair: separate inbound provider tag decoding from outbound local tag preference validation, add a post-write/re-Preview regression, keep PR #177 Draft/unmerged, then perform a read-only physical re-Preview of the already-created canary items.
EXTERNAL_INCREMENT_STATUS=PASS

RETURN_BRIDGE_STATUS=READY_FOR_OWNER_RELAY
TASK_ID=XHN-161-PHRASE-POSTWRITE-RECOVERY-20260906
TARGET_AGENT=Claude Code / Opus 5 / Extra / Standard / Single Agent
TARGET_CONVERSATION=CONTINUE_EXISTING
TARGET_CONVERSATION_TITLE=【XHN】#161 Retrofit Implementation
TARGET_WORKSPACE=/Users/david/Documents/GitHub/momo-moreEfficient
TARGET_BRANCH=claude/issue-161-batch-inspection
TARGET_PR=177
EXPECTED_PRE_REPAIR_HEAD=622c769c90c1b694b7da2cd204cab7c1f0a71dca
PROMPT_PREPARED=yes
PROMPT_VISIBLE_TO_OWNER=unknown_until_actual_delivery
EXTERNAL_AGENT_DISPATCHED=unknown
AGENT_RUN_COMPLETED=unknown
RESULT_RETURNED=no
RESULT_INGESTED=no
DUPLICATE_DISPATCH_ALLOWED=no_by_default
RETURN_CAN_RESUME_IN_FRESH_CHAT=yes
CURRENT_AUTHORITY=PR #177 reviews + Issue #161

Do not merge PR #177 before this repair and the bounded read-only physical canary are adjudicated.

[davidqyc]

Repair — phrase post-write recovery (936cf81)

Narrow repair on this branch for the regression the Owner reproduced on device: after a partial phrase run, the already-created phrase did not recover to 一致 on re-Preview — it became 阻断 / 无法安全读取例句状态.

The safety stop after the uncertain outcome was correct and is unchanged. The defect was on the read side.

Root cause

MaimemoTransport.phraseTags(_:) required every inbound tag to be a member of this app's local documentedTags write catalog, and capped the array at that catalog's length:

tags.count <= documentedTags.count,
tags.allSatisfy({ documentedTags.contains($0) })

That conflates two different contracts. The local catalog governs what the user may select and write; it says nothing about what the provider may return.

Failure chain — note that itemResponseRejected is deliberately not in abortsReadPlan, so it degrades to a per-item block rather than stopping the batch:

provider returns a valid phrase with a tag outside the local catalog
-> phraseTags throws CompanionError.itemResponseRejected
-> MaimemoTransport.phrases(vocabularyID:) rejects the whole record
-> PhrasePreflightPlanner generic catch -> reason "READ_FAILED"
-> 阻断 / 无法安全读取例句状态

phrases(vocabularyID:) is shared by three call sites, so the same decoder also backed the post-POST readback (PhraseCreateCore.confirmPhrase) and the #161 Query 例句 cell (QueryReadRunner). The observed 未确认 on the second item is consistent with the same mechanism reaching the readback path, though that one is not independently proven from the evidence supplied.

First-party contract

• Phrase.tags is typed as an open string[] — https://github.com/maimemo/memo-api-cli/blob/main/src/types/phrase.ts — not a closed enum.
• Official phrase integration fixtures return tags such as ["greeting"] and ["updated"] — https://github.com/maimemo/memo-api-cli/blob/main/test/commands/phrase.test.ts — which are outside this app's 22-item catalog.

So local outbound preference catalog != provider inbound phrase tag schema. The decoder was independently too strict against the provider contract; no repair is hard-coded around the 我创建 label seen in the Owner's screenshot, since we have no raw payload proving that label appears in Phrase.tags.

Exact fix

One function. Inbound tags must be a String array whose elements pass the same bounded safe-string check already used for origin:

guard let tags = raw as? [String],
      tags.allSatisfy({ safeSingleLine($0, maximumCharacters: 256) != nil })

No catalog-derived value or count limit is imposed on the provider; the array stays bounded by the existing whole-response size cap in jsonObject.

Unchanged, still failing closed: safe identifiers, duplicate-ID rejection, phrase text, interpretation text, origin, highlight decoding, the phrase status allowlist (PUBLISHED / DELETED), response-size cap, no mutation retry, and the whole Preview/write safety floor. Tags are not part of PhraseRecord.hardMatches and were not made so — identity remains English + Chinese + optional origin + PUBLISHED, so a matching phrase with a different provider tag classifies alreadyMatching and reports .tagsDiffer as an observation. Interpretation inbound tag semantics are deliberately untouched (documentedTags still gates that path).

Tests

Coverage	Result
Inbound non-local tags decode (["greeting"], ["updated"], mixed, and a 40-element array longer than the local catalog)	PASS
Malformed tag shapes/values still fail closed (non-array, non-String element, nested array, empty, whitespace-only, control character, newline, over-length)	PASS
Already-created phrase with a non-local tag recovers to .alreadyMatching / 一致 through the real decoder + PhrasePreflightPlanner — not READ_FAILED	PASS
Local outbound tag preference still closed: 22 items, max 3, unknown tag rejected, duplicates rejected	PASS
Query 例句 cell still counts truthfully and shows the record in detail	PASS
Existing privacy test retained, now driven by a genuinely malformed tag value carrying the sentinel	PASS

Negative control: with the pre-repair guard restored, testInboundPhraseTagsOutsideLocalWriteCatalogDecode and testAlreadyCreatedPhraseWithNonLocalProviderTagRecoversToAlreadyMatching both fail — the tests close the exact observed failure mode.

TARGETED_TESTS   PhraseCreateCoreTests 47 + QuerySessionStoreTests 26 -> 73 executed / 0 failures
FULL_UNIT_TESTS  411 executed / 0 skipped / 0 failures
UI_TESTS         not run — decoder-only repair, no production UI code changed
REAL_MAIMEMO_MUTATION_PERFORMED   no
IPHONE_MIRRORING_USED             no

Still pending

Physical read-only canary remains required and is a Coordinator gate — no write is needed to validate this. Re-Preview the same batch against the already-created canary phrases:

already-created first item(s) -> 一致
later never-written items     -> still 新建, subject to actual server truth
no duplicate POST

PR stays Draft; not merged.

[davidqyc]

Return Bridge — read-only physical re-Preview canary

RETURN_BRIDGE_STATUS=READY_FOR_OWNER_RELAY
TASK_ID=XHN-161-PHRASE-RECOVERY-PHYSICAL-READONLY-CANARY-20260906
TARGET_AGENT=Claude Code / existing Opus 5 session
TARGET_CONVERSATION=CONTINUE_EXISTING
TARGET_CONVERSATION_TITLE=【XHN】#161 Retrofit Implementation
TARGET_WORKSPACE=/Users/david/Documents/GitHub/momo-moreEfficient
CANDIDATE_PR=177
CANDIDATE_HEAD=936cf8123395238c0fada03e8f04faf7667f8fd9
REPAIR_RESULT=PASS_UPDATED_PR
REPAIR_COMMIT=936cf8123395238c0fada03e8f04faf7667f8fd9
AUTOMATED_EVIDENCE=73 targeted / 0 failures; 411 full unit / 0 failures
PHYSICAL_CANARY_MODE=READ_ONLY_PREVIEW_ONLY
REAL_MAIMEMO_MUTATION_ALLOWED=no
IPHONE_MIRRORING_ALLOWED=no
CANARY_INPUT=Owner's same phrase batch that previously produced shipping invoice/factory site post-write recovery block
EXPECTED_RECOVERY=already-created phrases become 一致 instead of READ_FAILED/阻断; never-written later phrases remain 新建 subject to actual provider truth
PROMPT_PREPARED=yes
PROMPT_VISIBLE_TO_OWNER=unknown_until_actual_delivery
EXTERNAL_AGENT_DISPATCHED=unknown
AGENT_RUN_COMPLETED=unknown
RESULT_RETURNED=no
RESULT_INGESTED=no
DUPLICATE_DISPATCH_ALLOWED=no_by_default
CURRENT_MERGE_GATE=BLOCK_PENDING_READ_ONLY_PHYSICAL_REPREVIEW
RETURN_CAN_RESUME_IN_FRESH_CHAT=yes

The repair root cause is accepted provisionally from the returned Builder result: inbound provider Phrase.tags was incorrectly gated by the app's local outbound tag catalog. PR #177 remains Draft/unmerged until this physical read-only canary closes the observed production recovery defect.

[davidqyc]

Physical read-only re-Preview canary — PASS

Exact candidate on device:

PR=177
HEAD=936cf8123395238c0fada03e8f04faf7667f8fd9
BUILD=1.0 (4) Release
REAL_MAIMEMO_MUTATION_DURING_CANARY=no

Owner pasted the same phrase batch from the failed production run and tapped Preview exactly once.

Observed physical result:

TOTAL=5
新建=3
一致=2
阻断=0

shipping invoice = 一致
factory site      = 一致
bulk email        = 新建
job vacancy       = 新建
fend off          = 新建

This exactly closes the targeted GET-only recovery defect:

already-created phrase
-> repaired inbound phrase decoder
-> subsequent authenticated read / Preview
-> 一致

The prior bad path 阻断 / 无法安全读取例句状态 is no longer reproduced on the real account/device.

The Owner did not tap the write/confirm action after this Preview, so this physical canary itself introduced no duplicate phrase POST.

PHYSICAL_PHRASE_POSTWRITE_RECOVERY=PASS
MERGE_GATE_PHYSICAL_REPREVIEW=CLOSED
NEXT_GATE=FRESH_INDEPENDENT_PR_REVIEW
PR_STAYS_DRAFT=yes
MERGE_AUTHORIZED=no

Note for the next review: the screenshot also visibly shows the write surface in a 需重新预览后才能写入 state after the read-only canary. That did not affect the targeted recovery verdict above, but fresh review should verify whether this stale/write-validity presentation is expected under the current candidate state or represents a separate regression before merge.

[davidqyc]

Clarification — stale Preview concern withdrawn

Owner clarified the earlier screenshot showing 需重新预览后才能写入 was taken after the phone had been locked / switched through mirroring for demonstration, and the Owner then explicitly ran Preview again.

Current physical screenshot after that fresh Preview shows:

新建 3
一致 2
阻断 0
shipping invoice -> 一致
factory site -> 一致
bulk email -> 新建
job vacancy -> 新建
fend off -> 新建
bottom action `新建 3 条例句` enabled

Therefore:

PHRASE_POSTWRITE_RECOVERY_PHYSICAL_CANARY=PASS
STALE_PREVIEW_FINDING=WITHDRAWN_AS_FALSE_ALARM_FROM_LOCK/MIRRORING_SEQUENCE
NO_NEW_STALE_STATE_BUG_OPENED=yes
REAL_MUTATION_DURING_CANARY=no

The physical repair gate is closed. PR #177 remains Draft only because the planned fresh independent PR review is still required before merge.

[davidqyc]

New physical evidence after recovery PASS — residual 未确认 still reproducible

Owner accidentally proceeded with the now-enabled 新建 3 条例句 action on exact physical candidate 936cf8123395238c0fada03e8f04faf7667f8fd9.

Observed execution result:

recognized total = 5
new items before execution = 3
execution summary = 成功 1 / 未确认 1 / 未执行 1
execution stopped after uncertain outcome
no evidence of duplicate POST

This does not invalidate the phrase decoder recovery fix: the earlier physical read-only re-Preview already proved the old 阻断 / 无法安全读取例句状态 regression is fixed (shipping invoice + factory site recovered to 一致, 阻断 0).

It does prove, however, that the original 未确认 phenomenon has an additional cause beyond the inbound-tag decoder bug, or at least is not eliminated by that decoder repair.

Current code already uses up to 3 GET-only phrase readback attempts after POST. Those reads are rate-window paced, but rate-window pacing is not itself a deliberate visibility-delay backoff when the request window has room. Therefore a short post-write visibility lag remains a plausible mechanism, but not proven from current evidence. Another readback-specific mismatch remains possible.

Fresh first-party scan: current Maimemo public docs/API CLI do not document a phrase-specific read-after-write visibility guarantee or required delay. General Maimemo documentation does acknowledge that some synchronized data can appear with delay, but that is not sufficient evidence to attribute phrase API readback behavior. So no timing patch is authorized yet.

Next gate — GET-only discrimination, no further write

Use the just-created server truth as a canary. Do not execute any more writes.

After a short bounded settle, perform exactly one fresh read-only Preview of the same 5-item batch.

Expected discriminating result if the uncertain POST actually succeeded and is now visible:

previously-existing + first successful new item + previously-unconfirmed new item -> 一致
never-attempted final new item -> 新建
阻断 -> 0

If the previously-unconfirmed item becomes 一致, classify the remaining problem as same-run readback confirmation window insufficient / provider visibility timing still unresolved and design a bounded GET-only recovery-window improvement before merge.

If it does not become 一致, inspect the exact Preview classification/reason before changing retry timing.

PHRASE_DECODER_RECOVERY=PASS_PHYSICAL
RESIDUAL_UNCONFIRMED=REPRODUCED_ON_REPAIRED_HEAD
NEW_MUTATION_AUTHORIZED=no
NEXT_ACTION=ONE_BOUNDED_READ_ONLY_REPREVIEW_AFTER_SETTLE
MERGE_GATE=BLOCK_PENDING_RESIDUAL_UNCONFIRMED_DISCRIMINATION

[davidqyc]

Fresh independent review dispatch checkpoint — 2026-09-06

Physical closure before review:

CANDIDATE_HEAD=936cf8123395238c0fada03e8f04faf7667f8fd9
PHRASE_DECODER_RECOVERY_PHYSICAL_CANARY=PASS
UNCERTAIN_OUTCOME_FAIL_CLOSED=PASS_OBSERVED
LATER_GET_RECONCILIATION=PASS
AUTO_MUTATION_RETRY=none
RESIDUAL_UNCONFIRMED_ROOT_CAUSE=unknown_review_only
EVENTUAL_CONSISTENCY_HYPOTHESIS=WITHDRAWN_NOT_PROVEN
NO_MORE_PHYSICAL_ACTION_REQUIRED=true

Fresh external routing increment: current OpenAI first-party docs position GPT-6 Astra as the most capable model for hard end-to-end reasoning/coding, support up to max reasoning, and list multi-agent orchestration among current capabilities. This PR has four genuinely independent long read-only review lanes, satisfying the live agent-skills multi-agent ROI gate.

Sources:

• https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6-astra
• https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/latest-model
• https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra/

EXTERNAL_INCREMENT_ROUND=XHN-161-PR177-FRESH-REVIEW-ROUTING-20260906
DECISION=Use GPT-6 Astra Ultra for fresh independent recall-max review
REVIEW_MODE=RECALL_MAX_PROGRESSIVE
LANES=write-safety/publication/uncertain-outcome; provider/query; state-concurrency-identity; retrofit-history-capture-navigation
FINDINGS_AGGREGATION=UNION_NOT_VOTE
BUILDER_CHANGES=HOLD_PENDING_REVIEW

Return Bridge:

RETURN_BRIDGE_STATUS=READY_FOR_OWNER_RELAY
TASK_ID=XHN-161-PR177-FRESH-RECALL-MAX-REVIEW-20260906
TARGET_AGENT=Codex GPT-6 Astra Ultra
TARGET_CONVERSATION=NEW_CONVERSATION
PROMPT_ARTIFACT=momo_161_PR177_Fresh_Recall_Max_Review_GPT6_Astra_2026-09-06.zip
PROMPT_SHA256=b45a5f47038bba3a9cb1721368d9465b012c0db32dde7fddb2dd09b8a963e668
PROMPT_PREPARED=yes
PROMPT_VISIBLE_TO_OWNER=unknown_until_actual_delivery
EXTERNAL_AGENT_DISPATCHED=unknown
AGENT_RUN_COMPLETED=unknown
RESULT_RETURNED=no
RESULT_INGESTED=no
DUPLICATE_DISPATCH_ALLOWED=no_by_default
RETURN_CAN_RESUME_IN_FRESH_CHAT=yes
CURRENT_AUTHORITY=PR #177 @ 936cf8123395238c0fada03e8f04faf7667f8fd9

Review is strictly read-only: no code edits, no PR mutation, no merge, no real Maimemo calls, no Token access, no iPhone Mirroring. Reviewer must return one actual downloadable Review ZIP plus candidate ledger for Coordinator progressive adjudication.