test: prototype M9-A0 OpenClaw trusted seams - #117
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
|
Follow-up plan execution is now recorded in
This is classified as an OpenClaw attempt/adapter-host readiness issue, not trusted-boundary pass evidence. No runtime code or external provider/Matrix resource was changed. |
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
|
Layer 2 continuation is recorded in commit
A0 stops at the supported model-emitting path bypass. Layer 3/4 and M9-A formal implementation remain blocked; no Matrix or external resource was created. |
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
|
Layer 3 disposable Tiangong control-handler prototype completed in
Layer 4 Basic Matrix remains unauthorized; M9-A formal implementation remains blocked pending A0 review/Matrix authorization. Evidence: |
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
|
Layer 4 Basic Matrix was explicitly authorized and executed in Direct facts from the final attempt:
All exact Team/Workers/containers/storage/research image resources were cleaned and verified absent. No further Matrix attempt or M9-A implementation should start until a reviewed real-path seam correction. Evidence is in |
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Shen <shenjiecode@gmail.com>
|
Corrected Layer 4 Basic Matrix canary now passes in
A0 is ready for review. Formal M9-A implementation has not started. |
Summary
2026.4.14;before_model_callandbefore_tool_result_releaseseams only in the disposable prototype;runEmbeddedAttemptharness readiness blocker and does not advance A0 layers 2–4.Direct result
2026.4.14 (2f35b6f), MITff58803f3497c4aa67f40c32cf72a63508dfb992aa87d037eda8b85146d3723fScope boundary
The patch is an evidence artifact only. It is not copied into Tiangong runtime, not accepted as a dependency, and does not authorize an OpenClaw upgrade. No fake provider layer, deterministic integration, Matrix turn, or external resource was started.
Verification
git diff --checkRefs #116
Related: #114, #115