Skip to content

Fix workflow issue and remove test copyright word#8

Merged
claudedigon merged 6 commits into
constructorfabric:mainfrom
vzhuman:main
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

Fix workflow issue and remove test copyright word#8
claudedigon merged 6 commits into
constructorfabric:mainfrom
vzhuman:main

Conversation

@vzhuman

@vzhuman vzhuman commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changed

Example of pull requests with website changes - removing Copyright word from website footer.

Pages to review

  • index.html
  • foundation.html
  • elements.html
  • learn.html
  • participate.html
  • privacy-policy.html
  • 404.html
  • styles.css
  • partials.jsx
  • assets/
  • Other:

Preview

A preview URL will be posted automatically by GitHub Actions after CI succeeds. The format is:

https://constructorfabric.github.io/website-previews/pr-<NUMBER>/

If you do not see a preview URL on this PR within a few minutes of pushing, see docs/pr-preview-process.md for troubleshooting.

Screenshots

Required for visual changes. Optional for text-only changes.

Desktop:

Screenshot 2026-06-22 at 1 47 05 PM

Mobile:

Screenshot 2026-06-22 at 1 47 20 PM

Checklist

  • I checked the site locally (Live Preview extension or python3 -m http.server)
  • I listed every affected page above
  • I added screenshots for visual changes
  • I avoided unrelated formatting changes
  • I followed the banned-words and no-emojis conventions in CONTRIBUTING.md

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@vzhuman, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 26 minutes and 28 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

To continue reviewing without waiting, enable usage-based billing in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3964b439-039a-479e-a249-705677424ee2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fdbd3a5 and a4cab0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/website-production-deploy.yml
  • partials.jsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@constructorfabric

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Preview deployment is ready:

https://constructorfabric.github.io/website-previews/pr-8/

This preview is built from the latest commit on this PR. It is regenerated automatically on every push. Old previews are cleaned up after 30 days.

@claudedigon claudedigon merged commit 409c6dc into constructorfabric:main Jun 22, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants