Repository navigation
test: pin down what the model-based test found - #4
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Add example-based tests for the cases that were missing: paths walked towards a smaller coordinate, both candidate paths blocked, and a planner reset without an obstacle after having had one. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
conjikidow
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2026
Add example-based tests for the cases that were missing: paths walked towards a smaller coordinate, both candidate paths blocked, and a planner reset without an obstacle after having had one. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds example-based tests for the cases the model-based test uncovered, which is what step 3 of the tutorial
asks participants to do.
Three gaps are covered: paths walked towards a smaller coordinate, both candidate paths blocked by the same
obstacle, and a planner reset without an obstacle after having had one.
The last one is the interesting case, since no hand-written test went anywhere near it and only replaying a
sequence of steps against the specification brought it out.
With this,
mainholds the reference solution the tutorial ends on.