Skip to content

Replace Python 3.6 with 3.13 - #5939

Merged
kenodegard merged 1 commit into
conda:mainfrom
kenodegard:test_conda_py_no_period
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

Replace Python 3.6 with 3.13#5939
kenodegard merged 1 commit into
conda:mainfrom
kenodegard:test_conda_py_no_period

Conversation

@kenodegard

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Extracted from #5938.

Checklist - did you ...

  • Add a file to the news directory (using the template) for the next release's release notes?
  • Add / update necessary tests?
  • Add / update outdated documentation?

@kenodegard
kenodegard requested a review from a team as a code owner March 27, 2026 18:10
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to 🆕 New in 🔎 Review Mar 27, 2026
@conda-bot conda-bot added the cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA label Mar 27, 2026
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 5 untouched benchmarks


Comparing kenodegard:test_conda_py_no_period (32d4f35) with main (6e90254)

Open in CodSpeed

@dholth dholth left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from 🆕 New to ✅ Approved in 🔎 Review Mar 27, 2026
@kenodegard
kenodegard enabled auto-merge (squash) March 27, 2026 19:28
@kenodegard
kenodegard merged commit f4d0adf into conda:main Mar 30, 2026
74 of 82 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from ✅ Approved to 🏁 Done in 🔎 Review Mar 30, 2026
@kenodegard
kenodegard deleted the test_conda_py_no_period branch March 30, 2026 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants