Skip to content

openimageio v3.1.14.1 - #155

Merged
conda-forge-admin merged 2 commits into
conda-forge:mainfrom
regro-cf-autotick-bot:3.1.14.1_h8bd723
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

openimageio v3.1.14.1#155
conda-forge-admin merged 2 commits into
conda-forge:mainfrom
regro-cf-autotick-bot:3.1.14.1_h8bd723

Conversation

@regro-cf-autotick-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It is very likely that the current package version for this feedstock is out of date.

Checklist before merging this PR:

  • Dependencies have been updated if changed: see upstream
  • Tests have passed
  • Updated license if changed and license_file is packaged

Information about this PR:

  1. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.
  2. The bot will almost always only open one PR per version.
  3. The bot will stop issuing PRs if more than 3 version bump PRs generated by the bot are open. If you don't want to package a particular version please close the PR.
  4. If you want these PRs to be merged automatically, make an issue with @conda-forge-admin,please add bot automerge in the title and merge the resulting PR. This command will add our bot automerge feature to your feedstock.
  5. If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

Pending Dependency Version Updates

Here is a list of all the pending dependency version updates for this repo. Please double check all dependencies before merging.

Name Upstream Version Current Version
libjpeg-turbo 10 Anaconda-Server Badge

This PR was created by the conda-forge-bot. The conda-forge-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-bot/actions/runs/27527962523 - please use this URL for debugging.

@conda-forge-admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/recipe.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@h-vetinari h-vetinari added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Jun 15, 2026
@conda-forge-admin
conda-forge-admin merged commit c8dcd84 into conda-forge:main Jun 15, 2026
9 checks passed
@conda-forge-admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

  • linter: passed
  • azure: passed
  • github-actions: passed

Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day!

@regro-cf-autotick-bot
regro-cf-autotick-bot deleted the 3.1.14.1_h8bd723 branch June 15, 2026 07:59
Comment thread recipe/recipe.yaml
version: "3.1.14.1"
# https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO/releases
ocio_version: "2.5.2"
build_number: 4

@ndeybach ndeybach Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@h-vetinari , this PR made me think on that, but :

isn't there a flaw in the recipe's logic when oiio is updated (and build-number reset) but not ocio ?

For example it seems we published 2 different 1 builds with different hash (probably corresponding to 2 oiio different versions that reset the build number):

Shouldn't we make a ocio_build_number separate from the oiio one ?
Or if there is a cleaner way with the staging / multi output I am interested in knowing it (otherwise supporting multiple version/build_number definitions and auto discovery of each by bot may be something to add in a future CEP/CFEP imo).


If that is ok with you, I can do a PR on that.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good observation, yes we should do that! :)

@ndeybach ndeybach mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2026
5 tasks
h-vetinari pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
as discussed in #155 (comment) , the ocio output had a shared build number. Meaning when oiio updated and the global build number was reset ... ocio was also reset.

Introduce a separate (not auto discovered by regro-bot) build number for ocio.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automerge Merge the PR when CI passes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants