Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Workflow uses ruby/setup-ruby@v1.312.0 (tag) instead of an immutable SHA and lacks checksum verification; pin the action to a specific commit SHA and enable checksum verification where supported.
Details
✨ AI Reasoning
The PR changed the workflow to use ruby/setup-ruby@v1.312.0 instead of ruby/setup-ruby@v1. This introduced a dependency reference that is still a version tag rather than an immutable commit SHA and does not include checksum verification. Using a tag allows the action source to change if the tag is repointed or re-released, which undermines strict dependency management. The change therefore fails the requirements to pin exact package versions (preferably SHAs) and to enable checksum verification where supported. This is a clear, actionable alignment issue with the dependency rules introduced/worsened by this commit.
🔧 How do I fix it?
Include lockfiles in your repo and CI. Pin exact versions or SHAs in manifests. Enable checksum verification. Set ignore-scripts in npm or equivalent. Enforce a 72hr minimum package age policy to avoid newly published malicious packages.
Reply
@AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK]to get better review comments in the future.Reply
@AikidoSec ignore: [REASON]to ignore this issue.More info