fix: stabilize hosted destroyer scenarios - #1
Merged
Conversation
smiggleworth
force-pushed
the
fix/destroyer-ci-stability
branch
from
September 2, 2026 19:52
a7e1706 to
1424d75
Compare
smiggleworth
force-pushed
the
fix/destroyer-ci-stability
branch
from
September 2, 2026 20:09
1424d75 to
eefddfc
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The original full run at https://github.com/cntryl/fitz-destroyer/actions/runs/33666942180 exposed seven scenario failures and five matrix omissions. The failures came from harness ordering, invalid same-type request concurrency, tmpfs loss during storage restart, Stream sessions stranded after ambiguous BEGIN responses, unbounded diagnostic work during sustained pressure, a hosted active-fault observation window that was shorter than the in-flight request lifecycle, and broker liveness gaps corrected by cntryl/fitz#231, cntryl/fitz#232, and cntryl/fitz#233.
Validation
npm run check: TypeScript compilation and 183/183 tests passedmainvalidation: https://github.com/cntryl/fitz-destroyer/actions/runs/33777076674 passed 60/60 jobs atb8f6cc4172f5ffb6cd412bf8456fafc5dc816885ghcr.io/cntryl/fitz-destroyer:b8f6cc4172f5ffb6cd412bf8456fafc5dc816885, digestsha256:51e3b32c2ddf0454f489c0f5db13f8c9d0046157cc49cce47ed34b70b70799f5ghcr.io/cntryl/fitz:latestand:main, digestsha256:1a864bf434378f7de36c44e0d9ceca60e091bb2c58a6b3a924417a9a42337bb7AI assistance
Codex assisted with hosted-artifact analysis, implementation, regression tests, local Docker validation, and end-to-end CI verification. I reviewed the complete diff and retained strict correctness assertions rather than suppressing scenario failures.