Update adept and g4vg due to update in VecGeom.

[akritkbehera]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @akritkbehera for branch IB/CMSSW_20_1_X/g4adept.

@akritkbehera, @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[akritkbehera]

please test for CMSSW_20_1_G4ADEPT_X

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c23114/54902/summary.html
COMMIT: 792fcb3
CMSSW: CMSSW_20_1_G4ADEPT_X_2026-07-12-2300/el9_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmsdist/10742/54902/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• @cms-sw Vecgeom: Update to version v2.1.0 #10711
• @cms-sw Python 3.12.13, massive update of python modules #10718
• @cms-sw Geant4 version 11.4.2 #10721
• @cms-sw improve license checking for newly build packages #10727
• @cms-sw rocm-libraries: change directory to correct project #10728
• @cms-sw Update tag for RecoTracker-FinalTrackSelectors to V01-06-01 #10729
• @cms-sw configtag V09-09-07: Modify Tool_DependencyCudaDLINK for conditional linking #10730
• @cms-sw Revert "configtag V09-09-07: Modify Tool_DependencyCudaDLINK for conditional linking" #10731
• @akritkbehera [ROOT636] Updated root to tip of branch v6-36-00-patches #10734
• @akritkbehera Fix Issues py-torch-rocm CI Failures related to AOTRITON  #10738
• @akritkbehera Update vecgeom version to 2.1.1 #10739

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c23114/54902/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c23114/54902/git-merge-result

Failed Unit Tests

I found 2 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestFWCoreReflectionClassVersionUpdate had ERRORS
---> test TestIOPoolInputNoParentDictionary had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 343 lines to the logs
• ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
• Reco comparison results: 67760 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 45
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3548186
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 432437
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 503
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3115228
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 18
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 2441.087 KiB( 44 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2023.0020001 ): -0.012 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2024.0020001 ): -0.008 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2024.0030001 ): 0.031 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2024.0040001 ): 0.020 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2024.0060001 ): 0.004 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2025.0010001 ): -0.004 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 34434.0,... ): 249.128 KiB HLT/HGCAL
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 34434.0,... ): 177.407 KiB HGCAL/HGCalValidator
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 34434.0,... ): 1.786 KiB HLTGenVal/tauHAD__HLT_LooseDeepTauPFTauHPS150_L2NN_eta2p1__hltHpsPFTau150LooseTauWPDeepTau__2Dvspteta
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 34434.0,... ): 1.774 KiB HLTGenVal/tauHAD__HLT_LooseDeepTauPFTauHPS150_L2NN_eta2p1__hltL1SingleNNTau150__2Dvspteta
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 34434.0 ): ...
• Checked 195 log files, 163 edm output root files, 45 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 15 / 44 workflows

[akritkbehera]

I think these are failures related to version update. If there is failure in IBs we can debug it there.

[akritkbehera]

+externals

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_20_1_X/g4adept IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)