Skip to content

Add ccdb.ssl_mode property to CC jobs - #682

Closed
philippthun wants to merge 1 commit into
cloudfoundry:developfrom
sap-contributions:ccdb-ssl-mode-no-verify
Closed

Add ccdb.ssl_mode property to CC jobs#682
philippthun wants to merge 1 commit into
cloudfoundry:developfrom
sap-contributions:ccdb-ssl-mode-no-verify

Conversation

@philippthun

@philippthun philippthun commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Expose an optional ccdb.ssl_mode BOSH property on all four jobs that render the CC database config (cloud_controller_ng, worker, clock, cc_deployment_updater). It is rendered into the db block only when set.

Export ccdb.ssl_mode via the cloud_controller_db link and render it in the jobs that read the DB config through that link (blobstore_benchmark, rotate_cc_database_key), so they stay consistent with the main jobs.

This lets operators pin the DB SSL mode when no ccdb.ca_cert is configured. Consumed by the CCNG db_connection option factories.

  • I have viewed signed and have submitted the Contributor License Agreement

  • I have made this pull request to the develop branch

  • I have run CF Acceptance Tests on bosh lite

Expose an optional ccdb.ssl_mode BOSH property on all four jobs that
render the CC database config (cloud_controller_ng, worker, clock,
cc_deployment_updater). It is rendered into the db block only when set.

Export ccdb.ssl_mode via the cloud_controller_db link and render it in
the jobs that read the DB config through that link (blobstore_benchmark,
rotate_cc_database_key), so they stay consistent with the main jobs.

This lets operators pin the DB SSL mode when no ccdb.ca_cert is
configured. Consumed by the CCNG db_connection option factories.
@philippthun
philippthun force-pushed the ccdb-ssl-mode-no-verify branch from 7923224 to f2c736a Compare August 25, 2026 17:04
@philippthun
philippthun marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2026 08:18
@philippthun
philippthun deleted the ccdb-ssl-mode-no-verify branch August 26, 2026 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants