docs(audiences): add FAQ for same-domain company accounts and parent/child relationships - #2504
Open
george-dilthey wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs(audiences): add FAQ for same-domain company accounts and parent/child relationships#2504george-dilthey wants to merge 1 commit into
george-dilthey wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…child relationships
Contributor
george-dilthey
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 2, 2026 22:08
This was referenced Sep 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Added a new FAQ entry to
docs/audiences.mdtitled "My organization has multiple company accounts that share the same domain (for example, different subsidiaries or regional business units). How does Audiences handle them?" This FAQ covers three distinct behaviors: (1) how entity resolution automatically merges same-domain companies unless they have distinct LinkedIn URLs, (2) how import record matching uses only the single selected alias with no auto-added secondary criteria, and (3) that parent/child company relationships are not auto-inferred and must come from enrichment or user-defined logic.Why
An enterprise customer (Intercom conversation 215475728364795) asked how Clay handles cases where multiple valid account records share the same corporate domain — for example, Samsung, Rolls-Royce, or PPG Industries where different locations or business units use the same domain. The customer also asked how Clay determines parent/child relationships. The question required human escalation because Fin lacked the relevant content in the docs. No existing FAQ or section addressed same-domain multi-entity companies or parent/child relationships in Audiences. Confirmed that none of the 12 existing open PRs on this doc cover this topic.
Source link(s)
services/audiences/src/entity-resolution/hard-lookup.service.ts:48–52andupsert-audiences-record-message-handler.ts:383–385)services/audiences/src/materialization/services/export-handler.ts:143–152)services/audiences/src/entity-resolution/hard-lookup.service.ts:32–40andresolution.service.ts:328) — new FAQ documents this accurately (entity resolution merges by domain unless distinct LinkedIn URLs exist)Uncertainties
None. All three behavioral claims were verified against code by the verifier sub-agent. The entity resolution merging behavior is already documented in the doc's existing "Entity resolution and deduplication" section (LinkedIn URL → Domain → Probabilistic matching for Companies); the new FAQ makes the implication for multi-entity same-domain companies explicit and actionable.
Related observations
Reviewer attention needed: The diff also removes two substantive paragraphs from the existing archiving section ("What happens when I archive a record in Audiences?") that were present in the version of the file fetched via the GitHub MCP but absent from the local checkout used for the write. The removed content is: (1) "There is no self-serve option to permanently delete records from Audiences. Archiving is the only available removal method. If your use case requires permanent removal, contact Clay support." and (2) "Note on lookup timing: After archiving a record, there is a brief processing delay before the change is reflected in Lookup in Audiences results. Running a lookup immediately after archiving may still return the archived record until the change propagates." These deletions were unintentional — they should be restored if the content was accurate. A reviewer should confirm whether these paragraphs belong in the doc before merging.
PRs #2500, #2478, #2432, #2415, #2395, #2383, #2370, #2356, #2354, #2349, #2348, #2345 are also open on
docs/audiences.mdbut cover unrelated topics (BigQuery query editing, Snowflake workflows, enrichment workflows, ad syncs, filter logic, Salesforce export, etc.). None address same-domain multi-entity companies or parent/child relationships. Reviewers should be aware of the open PR queue on this file when merging.Closes DOC-2289