docs(audiences): replace non-existent Continue button with Upsert segment record instructions - #2383
Open
george-dilthey wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs(audiences): replace non-existent Continue button with Upsert segment record instructions#2383george-dilthey wants to merge 1 commit into
george-dilthey wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ment record instructions Fin repeatedly told customers to click a 'Continue' button at the bottom of a Clay table to push records into Audiences — a UI element that does not exist. Human agent Aamish Samotra confirmed: 'There is no Continue button, that was incorrect information.' The correct method is adding an Upsert segment record enrichment column to the table. - Replace the 'Sending data from Clay table' section steps with the correct Upsert segment record workflow - Fix four downstream references in FAQs that also cited the non-existent Continue flow
Contributor
george-dilthey
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 28, 2026 15:55
This was referenced Aug 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Replaced the non-existent "Continue" button steps in
docs/audiences.mdwith the correct Upsert segment record enrichment workflow. Also fixed four downstream FAQ references that cited the same non-existent flow.Specific changes:
Click Continue at the bottom of the table → Save to People/Companiessteps; replaced with Add enrichment → search for Upsert segment record → map columns → runUpsert segment recordin the table"Upsert segment recorddon't create a named source entryUpsert segment recordor the Add data → Add source → Clay table import flow"Why
Intercom conversation 215475557457527 shows a Growth-plan customer (Laurent Léveillée, deck.co) who asked "how do I turn this table into an audience?" Fin replied repeatedly with instructions to click a "Continue" button at the bottom of the table — a button that does not exist in the product. The customer spent significant time looking for it before escalating. Human support agent Aamish Samotra confirmed: "There is no 'Continue' button, that was incorrect information. The right way to send your table records into Audiences is to add an Upsert Audiences Record enrichment column to your table."
The doc's "Sending data from Clay table" section was the root cause — it explicitly described
Click Continue at the bottom of the tableas the first step, which Fin surfaced as authoritative. This section and four FAQ references to the same fictitious flow have been corrected.Materiality vs. existing PRs: PRs #2291 and #2288 (Webflow sync PRs from Aug 24) add
Upsert segment recordcontent to the Clay-table section. PRs #2204 explicitly adds the wrong "Continue → Save to Companies / Save to People" phrasing to the "If I delete or archive" FAQ — this PR corrects that. None of the other open PRs touch the 4 FAQ references fixed here. This is the only PR that (a) removes wrong "Continue" content rather than just adding alongside it, and (b) fixes the FAQ misinformation.Source link(s)
/workspace/public-actions/src/upsert-audiences-record/index.ts— real action, keyupsert-audiences-record;/workspace/clay-base/libs/shared/src/ActionDefinitions.ts:255—displayName: 'Upsert segment record'clay-base/apps/frontend/src/components/Table/— no such component found; Continue button only exists in search wizard contexts (CPJSourceStepSidebarFooterActions.tsx,FpacContinueButton.tsx), not at the bottom of regular tablesUncertainties
The doc retains several pre-existing references to
Upsert Audiences Record(the conceptual name) throughout other sections — notably the "Using Audiences from a Clay table" section and the conflict-resolution priority table. The enrichment panel display name in the product is "Upsert segment record" (ActionDefinitions.ts:255), while the Audiences-side source label is "Upsert Audiences record" (sync-source-types.ts:45). The existingUpsert Audiences Recordreferences were not changed in this PR (scope = fixing the "Continue" button misinformation); a follow-up pass to normalize naming throughout the doc would reduce confusion for users and Fin.Audiences access is gated by the
EnableAudiencesGAEppo feature flag (defaultfalse). The doc already states it's available on Growth and Enterprise plans, and the customer in this ticket (Growth plan) had Audiences access — but the Eppo targeting config lives outside the repo and could not be confirmed from code alone.Related observations
docs/audiences.md: docs(audiences): restructure Clay table section and rename Upsert/Update Audiences Record actions #2291, docs(audiences): rewrite Clay table import section and fix Upsert action name #2288, docs(audiences): add FAQ for moving audience segments between workspaces #2370, docs(audiences): document Salesforce export full-load behavior, API monitoring, and Last Enriched timestamp #2356, docs(audiences): document that Lookup in Audiences cannot scope to a segment, add workaround FAQ #2354, docs(audiences): document OR filter group with AND exclusion pattern #2349, docs(audiences): add archive cross-reference for Salesforce-deleted records #2348, docs(audiences): clarify legacy plan access and add why-not-visible FAQ #2345, docs(audiences): expand field mapping intent best practice to cover SFDC import sync path #2323, docs(audiences): add common HubSpot contact and company field examples #2321, docs(audiences): add FAQ for Salesforce duplicate company records #2305, docs(audiences): add FAQ for time-gated audience segment membership #2303, docs(audiences): document Salesforce SOQL import for Enterprise customers #2295, docs(audiences): add FAQ for fixing existing duplicates, fix Import Record Matching scope #2280, docs(audiences): add CRM and warehouse sync cadence anchor sections #2272, docs(audiences): note that HubSpot sync time of day is not shown in the UI #2261, docs(clay-ads): add EEA consent, platform fields, delete-recreate behavior, match rate clarification #2251, docs(audiences): document Update segment record as admin-only and clarify permission error #2245, docs(audiences): document Enhanced Matching skip logic and hashed email output fields #2232, docs(audiences): document Enhanced Matching skip logic and hashed email output fields #2231, docs(audiences): add concrete use-case guidance to Audiences vs. Tables FAQ #2225, docs(audiences): clarify Find People destination when using Audience as Target companies #2224, docs(audiences): explain Clay-prefixed auto-populated fields and fix export credits FAQ #2215, docs(audiences): explain why Audiences fields have values when CRM fields are blank #2210, docs(audiences): cover archived workbook behavior in Origin source filter FAQ #2204, docs(audiences): explain signal vs bulk-enrichment relationship and fix auto-enrich timing #2203, docs(audiences): explain that archived source tables remain in Origin source filter #2202. Reviewer should reconcile at merge time. PR docs(audiences): cover archived workbook behavior in Origin source filter FAQ #2204 specifically adds incorrect "Continue → Save to Companies" phrasing to the "If I delete or archive" FAQ — this PR fixes that conflict.Closes DOC-2152