Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Cultural macroevolution of musical instruments in South America

Data and scripts


This repository contains the data and scripts for the paper "Cultural macroevolution of musical instruments in South America", written by Gabriel Aguirre-Fernandez, Chiara Barbieri, Anna Graff, José Pérez de Arce A., Hyram Moreno and Marcelo Sánchez-Villagra. LINK

The file testIzikowitz includes R commands to elaborate the aerophone data from Izikowitz classification Supplementary Table S2 into a distance matrix, create a Neighbor Joining tree with bootstrap values, display the distribution of different instruments on a continental map, evaluate relationships between different societies by comparinng their similarity in music instruments set and their geographic distances.


Supplementary Tables

  • Supplementary Table S1: Classification of instruments according to Hornbostel and Sachs (1914), subsequent revisions and new data for South America.

  • Supplementary Table S2: Instrument repertoire based on the work of Izikowitz (1935) on ethnographic data, and information on the societies for which the instrument data is found. For each society, the presence/absence of each music instrument is recorded (57 types of instruments in 144 societies or ethnic groups). Character state 1 marks the definite presence of an instrument in the ethnographic record and 0 marks the lack of evidence for a particular instrument.

  • Supplementary Table S3: Data matrix of panpipe profiles. The dataset includes 13 instrument features subdivided in 53 different character states, annotated for 61 societies or ethnic groups. Features:

  1. Size: Small, maximum height less than 10 cm (0); medium, maximum height between 10 cm and 50 cm (1); large, more than 50 cm (2).

  2. Number of rows : Single (0); double, distal row has open tubes (open at both ends) (1); double, distal row has closed tubes (2).

  3. Parts: One part (0); two parts, two complementary instruments, or parts of an instrument, are played collectively by two musicians (1); two parts, two complementary parts of a panpipe are attached by a string (2).

  4. Number of single pipes forming the first row (modified from Izikowitz, 1935. Note: on double panpipes with resonator, the closed row is counted; when both rows are closed e.g., [siku], the greatest number is recorded here): Less than four (0); four (1); five (2); six (3); seven (4); eight (5); nine to eleven (6); twelve (7); more than twelve (8).

  5. Seriation of pipes : One series in decreasing order (0); multiple series in consecutive decreasing order (1—rondador); shortest tube in the middle (2); two decreasing series (3); longest in the middle (4); longest on the sides (5).

  6. Ligature kind (inapplicable for clay and stone panpipes): Guna (0); simple (1); complex ligature thread only(2—chain and possibly campa ligatures); covered in a cloth (3— no ligature); horizontal splint (4); two splints(5); Aymara ligature (6); extensively covered by thread (7); stick between ligature (8); reed (9); similar to Aymara (A).  

  7. Resin was used either to put tubes together or to cover some tubes (inapplicable for clay and stone panpipes): No (0); yes (1).

  8. Space is left below the node on the distal part (inapplicable for clay and stone panpipes): No (0); yes (1).

  9. Indentations on proximal (blowing) ends of panpipes (inapplicable for clay and stone panpipes): Absent (0); present (1); sharpened end (2); two cuts (3).

  10. Distal profile: Tubes show externally the same length (0); laddered profile (1); diagonal profile (2).

  11. Some tubes made by more than one culm (inapplicable for clay and stone panpipes): No (0); yes (1).

  12. Textile art (inapplicable for clay and stone panpipes): None (0); coloured threads used for binding (1); patterns covering large area of tubes (2).

  13. Feathers attached (inapplicable for clay and stone panpipes): No (0); yes (1).


Fig. 1 Examples of pre-Columbian aerophones in South America (not to scale): a. double-chambered whistling vessel of La Tolita culture (MAAC-2-2857-85); b) ‘snail-chambered’ ceramic globular whistle of the Cuasmal culture (CPS-60); c) conch horn of the Chavín culture (photo JPDA); d) stone panpipe, Tilcara; e) ocarina in the shape of a parrot (Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen-198); f) double-chambered ocarina of La Tolita culture (MAAC-1-2996-87); g) bullroarer from the Apinayé (GM-31.40.266)32; h) wood trumpet of the Chimu culture (Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen-120); i) Mapuche trumpet ‘Nolkin’, played by inhalation; j) Quena made of bone of the Nasca culture (GM-29.32.4h). Figure by Vera Primavera

About

data and scripts for the paper "Cultural macroevolution of musical instruments in South America"

Resources

Stars

4 stars

Watchers

2 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages