Release 5.4.0

[armando-rodriguez-cko]

• Add InstrumentDocumentType with bank_statement for bank account payment instrument documents (feat: add InstrumentDocumentType with bank_statement #360)
• Model the onboarding bank_verification, articles_of_association and shareholder_structure documents as their own classes with their own type constants, instead of the generic Document whose docblock pointed at the identity DocumentType (feat: model the onboarding bank, articles and shareholder documents #361)

[agent-wall-e]

🟡 Risk Classification: MINOR

Approval route: AI Review + Human Approval
Rollback controls: Staged rollout + rollback

Classification reasons

• no_low_class_matched
• prod_source_modified

Operational gates

• ✅ jira_ticket
• ✅ independent_review

Files analysed: 2

---

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · policy 376219bc71e6…}

[agent-wall-e]

🔬 Debug — why this classification?

Each reason code emitted by the classifier, its source clause in the AI in SDLC Control Framework, and what it means.

Reason code	Kind	Clause	Meaning
no_low_class_matched	informational	§2.2 (fall-through)	None of the deterministic Low classes (§2.2.3, §2.2.4, §2.2.7, docs-only) applied; classifier fell through to LLM evaluation.
prod_source_modified	informational	§2.1 M7 (informational)	At least one file is non-doc, non-test, non-IaC — i.e. application source code was modified.

Kinds:

• classifying — this rule contributed to the chosen tier.
• informational — context only; did not by itself decide the tier.

See issue #3 for the proposal to formalise this map as Appendix A of the standards doc.

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · debug}

[agent-wall-e]

🔵 Advisory review: Sound, but needs your judgement

This PR needs a human approval. The code itself reads as correct; whether it should land depends on context I don't have.

This diff only bumps the version from 5.3.0 to 5.4.0 in two places, but the PR description claims two substantive feature changes (InstrumentDocumentType with bank_statement, and new document classes for bank_verification/articles_of_association/shareholder_structure). None of that implementation code appears in the diff.

For you to decide

• The diff contains only version string changes; the feature code described in the PR body (new InstrumentDocumentType, new document classes) is not visible here — either it is in prior commits/PRs not included, or the diff is partial and a human must verify those changes are actually present in the branch.
• If the substantive changes from feat: add InstrumentDocumentType with bank_statement #360 and feat: model the onboarding bank, articles and shareholder documents #361 are already merged and this is purely a release-bump commit, the version increment looks correct and consistent across both files.
• A human reviewer should confirm the referenced issues (feat: add InstrumentDocumentType with bank_statement #360, feat: model the onboarding bank, articles and shareholder documents #361) are fully included in this release branch before approving the version bump.

---

_{This is not an approval. wall-e cannot auto-approve this PR — it is an opinion to help whoever does. Advisory review · us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6 · wall-e 2026.06.19-02}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud