Repository navigation
Protect registered ports and make page card numbers unambiguous - #81
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sandbox servers could claim an unbound port reserved for another page, and different card publishers could reuse a page number. Refuse server startup on another page's registered port and make automatic allocation skip reservations; reserve card numbers under the existing store lock across single creates, batches, and edits, with a conflict receipt naming the occupied comment/version and next free number.
Existing duplicate stores remain unchanged: live/current cards retain their base number and older duplicates use labels such as
#41·2, leaving new plain numbers available. CLI, browser badges, resolve/withdraw, and finding lookup agree. Re-publishing the same numbered question at the same anchor updates the same card, and unnumbered re-asks retain approval lineage.Validation:
064b1d5(2.28.0) with failing regressions before product edits; real duplicate 10/12/41 history checked through read-only temporary snapshots.e5a2e52; ready for review againstchangl/fixes.Beads: agent-annotate-zv7, agent-annotate-lw1 (left open as requested).