change strategy to lockfile-only - #269
Merged
Merged
Conversation
wgreenberg
approved these changes
May 9, 2026
wgreenberg
left a comment
wgreenberg
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what a deeply annoying documentation failure! thanks for digging into this tho 😭
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this is a follow up to #268
one would think that based on the description of "widen", it'd have fixed the problems seen in #267 of bumping our dependency requirements to the latest version. unfortunately it seems that despite widen being documented, it isn't supported for python. additionally, many other people are also annoyed with dependabot's new behavior here
this PR actually fixes the issue which you can see on my fork here. i'm sorry i didn't test it on my fork the first time, but i figured it'd just work and doing so wouldn't be needed. how silly of me 😩
i don't think this PR requires two reviews