Skip to content

Chore/merge upstream - #22

Merged
Kammerlo merged 25 commits into
mainfrom
chore/merge-upstream
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

Chore/merge upstream#22
Kammerlo merged 25 commits into
mainfrom
chore/merge-upstream

Conversation

@Kammerlo

@Kammerlo Kammerlo commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Tests

Checklist

  • I have formatted and linted my code
  • All new and existing tests pass
  • My commits are signed (required for merge) -- you may need to rebase if you initially pushed unsigned commits
  • I added a changelog fragment for user-facing changes (docs-only changes can skip)

Kammerlo and others added 8 commits July 21, 2026 13:57
Keep the existing Cardano scheme structure while defining the Masumi V2 request commitment, seller authorization, escrow datum, settlement policies, Hydra path, and replay rules.
- order client submission before paid retry
- bind registered agents to the global V2 registry
- validate Hydra nonces in the selected head ledger
docs(cardano): define Masumi V2 x402 flow
# Conflicts:
#	examples/typescript/facilitator/advanced/all_networks.ts
#	examples/typescript/servers/advanced/README.md
#	examples/typescript/servers/advanced/all_networks.ts
# Conflicts:
#	e2e/clients/axios/test.config.json
#	e2e/clients/fetch/test.config.json
#	e2e/facilitators/typescript/test.config.json
#	e2e/src/networks/networks.ts
#	e2e/src/types.ts
#	e2e/test.ts
#	examples/typescript/clients/advanced/README.md
#	examples/typescript/clients/advanced/all_networks.ts
#	examples/typescript/facilitator/advanced/README.md
#	examples/typescript/facilitator/advanced/all_networks.ts
#	examples/typescript/pnpm-lock.yaml
#	examples/typescript/servers/advanced/README.md
#	examples/typescript/servers/advanced/all_networks.ts
#	typescript/package.json
schaier-io and others added 10 commits August 4, 2026 15:01
Restrict Masumi datum addresses to the forms the escrow lifecycle can
carry end to end: enterprise key addresses and base addresses whose
payment and stake credentials are both key hashes. Masumi's own
getPubKeyAddressDatum accepts nothing else, and every later transition
rebuilds the continuation datum through it while vested_pay demands
`new_datum.buyer == buyer` exactly, so a script stake credential or a
pointer address strands the escrow with no recovery path.

Enforce the deadline and payment-window rules at issue time. payByTime,
the deadline gaps, Masumi's 15-minute submitResultTime lead and
maxTimeoutSeconds are all covered by termsDigest, so a 402 that a buyer
refuses cannot be repaired afterwards - only re-issued. Deadline strings
are guarded before conversion so an unparseable value is a named
rejection rather than a raw SyntaxError from BigInt. The interval rule
now lives in one place and is shared by the issuer, the client and the
facilitator instead of being copied three times.

Make the facilitator capability check coherently fail-closed: a
facilitator that publishes no extra is not describing itself and passes,
but one that publishes a half-filled block is a rejection rather than
silent permission to serve a 402 nobody can settle. Read settlementPolicy
through the schema instead of an unchecked cast.

Drop the dead maxTimeoutSeconds re-check before submission - the ceiling
grows with the clock and cannot newly fail - keeping only the expiry
check, which can.

Document the relationship to masumi-payment-service: the escrow address,
datum, collateral floor, min-UTxO headroom and blockchainIdentifier all
match the deployed V2 contract, but reference_signature covers this
scheme's termsDigest rather than Masumi's signed payload, so a lock built
here cannot be driven through a Masumi node.
Two seller-controlled values had no ceiling, and together they let a
hostile or compromised resource server freeze a buyer's wallet while
passing every existing check.

Cap the deadline horizon. vested_pay gates the buyer's WithdrawRefund on
`must_start_after(validity_range, submit_result_time)`, so until that
deadline the buyer can recover neither the payment nor its collateral.
Only minimum gaps were enforced, so a 402 naming external_dispute_unlock_
time years out froze the funds for that long. The issuer, the client and
the facilitator now reject a last deadline more than 30 days out, and the
client can raise the horizon for a counterparty whose settlement window it
accepts. Checking against the verifier's own clock is monotonic: a
facilitator sees a later `now` than the client did, so it can only accept
what the client already accepted, never newly reject it.

Cap the collateral. collateral_return_lovelace is derived from the datum
size, and the datum carries reference_key and reference_signature verbatim
- each allowed up to MAX_MASUMI_COSE_BYTES. A real lock is a ~450-byte
datum needing at most ~3.7 ADA; padding the COSE fields toward the
ledger's transaction limit pushes the buyer's own locked collateral past
50 ADA. The client now refuses a collateral above a configurable ceiling
before it signs, rather than locking the funds away until
submit_result_time.
Reject Masumi `auto` settlement against a facilitator that advertises only
Hydra. This scheme authenticates L1 exclusively - verifyMasumiLock refuses
a Hydra payload outright - so treating a Hydra-only advertisement as
satisfying `auto` served a 402 whose every payment fails at verification.
An explicit `hydra` policy still defers to the advertisement, so a subclass
that does implement Hydra is unaffected.

Re-check the clock-relative issue policy after `signTerms` resolves.
Signing is asynchronous and unbounded - a hardware wallet, a remote signer
or a human approval can take minutes - so a 402 could be served with a
`payByTime` that expired while it was being signed. The second pass reads
this function's own `terms` and `requirements` rather than `input`, so a
caller mutating its argument mid-flight cannot steer it. The
`maxTimeoutSeconds` ceiling is deliberately not the trigger: it moves
forward with the clock and cannot newly fail.

Skip the issue policy only for the literal boolean `true`, so a truthy
non-boolean arriving from untyped configuration cannot silently disable a
security check.

Let the issuer configure its deadline horizon instead of always using the
constant, mirroring the buyer-side option.

Compute the test fixture's deadlines when each case runs rather than at
module load. `payByTime` has only a minute of slack inside
`maxTimeoutSeconds`, so a slow suite would have started failing on timing
alone.
…rule

The horizon check ran on every path through verifyMasumiAuthorization, but
only the client could configure it - the facilitator never sets
maxDeadlineHorizonMs, so it was pinned to the 30-day default. A client
whose operator raised the horizon to accept a long-settlement counterparty
would sign and broadcast a lock the facilitator then rejected, stranding
the funds the check exists to protect.

The horizon is a judgement about how long the payer will accept its own
funds being immobilised, so the payer is the side that makes it. It now
applies only when a caller supplies one: the client always does, defaulting
to the constant, and a verifier does not. Once the funds are locked,
rejecting the payment for a distant deadline unfreezes nothing anyway - it
only adds a failed settlement to a lock the buyer already chose to make.
The interval rule is a protocol rule and still applies everywhere.

Also correct the assertMasumiIssueWindow doc: it claimed the post-signing
pass guards against drifting outside maxTimeoutSeconds, which it cannot.
That ceiling is `now + maxTimeoutSeconds` and moves forward with the clock,
so a payByTime once inside it stays inside it. Only the floors can trip
late, which is what the second pass is for.
…mplementation

fix(cardano): harden Masumi payment validation
@Kammerlo
Kammerlo merged commit 3222744 into main Aug 5, 2026
16 checks passed
@Kammerlo
Kammerlo deleted the chore/merge-upstream branch August 20, 2026 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants