Skip to content

.github/workflows: pin gocover repository version to v1.4.0 - #17400

Open
Rnfudge02 wants to merge 1 commit into
canonical:masterfrom
Rnfudge02:pin-gocover
Open

.github/workflows: pin gocover repository version to v1.4.0#17400
Rnfudge02 wants to merge 1 commit into
canonical:masterfrom
Rnfudge02:pin-gocover

Conversation

@Rnfudge02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The weekly-static-analysis workflow that creates the TICs server output hasn't been working since mid-may because gocover-cobertura has been updated with breaking changes. We should pin the version for now, but audit and update to the newer version for better results at a later date.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.93%. Comparing base (f5eb159) to head (4694dfc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #17400      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.87%   78.93%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1404     1395       -9     
  Lines      196315   196160     -155     
  Branches     2462     2462              
==========================================
- Hits       154835   154832       -3     
+ Misses      32195    32048     -147     
+ Partials     9285     9280       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.93% <ø> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thu Jul 23 16:38:01 UTC 2026
The following results are from: https://github.com/canonical/snapd/actions/runs/30017822731

Failures:

Preparing:

  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/interfaces-posix-mq
  • openstack:ubuntu-24.04-64:tests/regression/lp-1871652
  • openstack:ubuntu-24.04-64:tests/main/nvidia-files:535_server
  • openstack:ubuntu-24.04-64:tests/main/nvidia-files:535

Executing:

  • openstack:debian-12-64:tests/main/cgroup-devices-v2
  • openstack:ubuntu-core-20-64:tests/core/snapd-maintenance-msg
  • openstack:ubuntu-core-24-64:tests/main/dbus-activation-session
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/auto-refresh-pre-download:restart
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/auto-refresh-pre-download:close
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/auto-refresh-pre-download:ignore
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/broken-seeding
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/auto-refresh-pre-download:close_mid_restart
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/snap-info
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/snap-user-service
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/bad-interfaces-warn
  • openstack:ubuntu-20.04-64:tests/main/mix-revision-and-channel

Restoring:

  • openstack:ubuntu-core-20-64:tests/core/snapd-maintenance-msg
  • openstack:ubuntu-core-20-64:tests/core/
  • openstack:ubuntu-core-20-64:
  • openstack:ubuntu-24.04-64:tests/regression/lp-1871652

Skipped tests from snapd-testing-skip

If you wish to have any of the below tests run in your PR, in your PR description, add 'unskip:' followed by a copy-and-pasted list of the below tests you wish to run (unskip plus test list must be valid yaml)

  • openstack:ubuntu-24.04-64:tests/main/i18n
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/apparmor-prompting-flag-restart
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/apparmor-prompting-integration-tests
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/apparmor-prompting-prompt-restoration
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/apparmor-prompting-smoke
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/apparmor-prompting-snapd-startup
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/apparmor-prompting-support
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/i18n
  • openstack:ubuntu-26.04-64:tests/main/interfaces-requests-activates-handlers

@bboozzoo bboozzoo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants