Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2026. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2026. It is now read-only.

Roadmap: Elevate Synapse to a market-leading managed beta #71

Closed as not planned

Description

@camster91

Objective

Elevate Synapse into a focused, dependable, commercially viable managed beta using evidence-backed release, trust, customer and economics gates.

This is the governing GitHub roadmap. PRODUCT.md is the detailed product/evidence source of truth; BACKLOG.md is the technical implementation record.

Current repository state — 2026-09-05

Current main:
b45170409543684a75579a13d7bdd6d8f8ffe8e8

This is not the final pre-pilot candidate.

PR #95 is now ready for an explicit merge decision, not draft, on exact reviewed head:
431d7da80c9bac56aa16423ab61a235a176b6fd8

PR #95 exact-head evidence:

  • Codex final review: no major issues;
  • Ashbi Local CI: passed isolated install, Prisma generation, TypeScript, ESLint, focused auth/navigation/security tests, and production Next build;
  • GitGuardian: passed, no secrets;
  • all inline recovery review threads resolved;
  • PostgreSQL documentation confirms normal-operation OIDs are 16384+, supporting the high-OID user-created system-schema contamination guard;
  • hosted GitHub CI Build / Build: zero-step failure from the continuing runner-infrastructure incident.

Ashbi Local CI does not directly execute tests/backup-restore.test.ts; those recovery contract assertions were separately checked against the exact branch text, while Local CI supplies compile/lint/build compatibility evidence.

PR #95 remains unmerged. If explicitly merged, the resulting main SHA becomes the repository candidate and all exact-SHA/image/evidence references must be rebound to that result.

Success definition

  • Five approved target users complete the no-payment two-week pilot.
  • At least 4/5 understand the goals-to-today promise and reach first value within ten minutes.
  • At least 4/5 resolve a daily plan on 8/14 days and cite a concrete outcome improvement.
  • Export/deletion, reliability, security/privacy, accessibility, recovery, support and rollback gates pass.
  • Observed service economics can sustain the approved contribution-margin target.
  • No release, pricing, spend, legal commitment, payment collection or outreach occurs without its explicit approval.

Phase 0 — Final RC1 correctness freeze

No #29/#61 recovery evidence or #70 final artifact freeze may run against an intermediate PR head or the stale b451704… candidate.

Phase 1 — Runtime, governance, trust and operations

Phase 2 — Rendered and AI validation

Phase 3 — Pre-pilot customer/economics readiness

Phase 4 — Exact artifact approval

Phase 5 — Managed beta and closeout

RC1 execution order

  1. fix: reconcile restored upload target during recovery drill #95 disposition → resulting main SHA freeze.
  2. P0: Run production Compose image/database smoke and close configuration audit #29 isolated runtime/recovery proof on that exact SHA/image.
  3. P0: Restore application validation for production dependency pull requests #49 governance enforcement; Stage A may be applied earlier once separately approved, while Stage B waits for hosted Build recovery.
  4. P0: Complete production operations, backup, monitoring, and rollback evidence #61 operations evidence.
  5. P0: Verify external email delivery and complete authentication journey QA #60 external email/auth QA.
  6. P0: Approve legal and data policy and correct license ownership #62 + P0: Establish beta support and incident response operations #63 qualified participant policy/support model.
  7. P1: Validate the complete customer lifecycle in rendered browser QA #64 + P1: Run representative AI task-creation quality, safety, latency, and cost evaluation #67 rendered lifecycle and AI validation.
  8. P1: Validate goals-to-today positioning and first-value comprehension #65 + P1: Validate managed-beta pricing and sustainable unit economics #68 pre-pilot readiness.
  9. P0: Assemble exact-SHA release approval package and staged rollout #70 exact artifact/staged deployment approval.
  10. P1: Run the five-user 14-day managed-beta validation pilot #66 14-day pilot.
  11. P1: Validate managed-beta pricing and sustainable unit economics #68 post-pilot economics and keep/revise/stop decision.

No later phase may silently bypass an unfinished earlier gate.

Dependency rules — no circular gates

Post-beta — Paid lifecycle

The five-user managed beta remains no-payment. Provider selection, public pricing and payment collection are separate later approvals.

Post-RC1 — Adaptive Planning

Adaptive Planning remains product direction but is excluded from RC1. PR #79 contains the deferred implementation for:

PR #79 must later be rebased onto post-beta main, fully tested, migration-verified and rendered-QA verified before any merge.

Planned post-RC1 loop:
Goals → Today → Execute → Life changes → Adapt → Reflect → Learn → Tomorrow

Initial Adaptive Planning slice remains My day changed, with explainable Keep / Shorten / Move / Drop proposals and explicit confirmation before mutation.

Other frozen PR work

Issue lifecycle rules

Every issue remains one of:

  • Completed and verified — acceptance evidence exists; close it.
  • Completed awaiting verification — implementation exists; keep open with exact missing evidence.
  • Blocked / approval-required — keep open with exact decision/action.
  • Customer-validation pending — keep open until measured participant evidence exists.
  • Post-beta / Post-RC1 — keep open but explicitly outside current release gates.

Operating rules

  • RC1 accepts release blockers, security/reliability corrections and verification work only.
  • Proposed, implemented, verified, released and customer-validated are not interchangeable.
  • Evidence must bind to the exact final repository SHA and deployed image digest where applicable.
  • No customer content, credentials, raw tokens or participant identities belong in GitHub evidence.
  • Approval-required labels preserve the owner boundary; preparation does not authorize the external action.
  • A complete release checklist is never deployment authorization.

Next transition

The repository-side planning/preparation for this gate is complete. The next unresolved transition is the explicit disposition of ready PR #95. After a merge, refetch/freeze the resulting main SHA and continue with #29; without a merge approval, do not execute #29 against the old candidate.

Activity

  1. added this to the Market-leading beta milestone on Sep 2, 2026
  2. added
    area:productPositioning and customer journey
    roadmapPart of the authoritative market-leading roadmap
    on Sep 2, 2026
  3. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 integration plan prepared 2026-09-03 — planning only; no merge authorization implied.

    Open RC1 preparation PRs:

    Recommended eventual integration order after explicit merge approval and review:

    1. fix: require PostgreSQL migration proof in canonical CI #85 first, so the intended canonical validation contract lands before other RC1 work.
    2. fix: complete RC1 email verification and password recovery #83 next, because it is the broadest application/security change and should be revalidated before layering operational docs/tooling.
    3. docs: add factual RC1 legal and data review inventory #87 can land independently after review because it has no overlapping files and makes no legal changes.
    4. Integrate feat: add RC1 beta support and incident operations #84, then rebase/update feat: add strict RC1 operations decision and evidence gates #86 and feat: add exact-artifact RC1 release approval package #88 so their package.json script additions are combined rather than conflicting/overwriting one another.
    5. Integrate feat: add strict RC1 operations decision and evidence gates #86 after that rebase/update.
    6. Rebase/update feat: add exact-artifact RC1 release approval package #88 last so the release-package validator is built against the final RC1 preparation surface.

    After every merge, revalidate the new exact head; do not inherit a green result from an earlier PR SHA. Hosted CI is currently blocked by zero-step runner-allocation failures, so this sequence is not yet merge-ready evidence.

    Branch protection, provider/DNS setup, production infrastructure, legal publication, deployment and pilot outreach remain separate approval gates.

  4. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 reconciliation after approved merges — 2026-09-04

    Current main: b16ca80a28e96ad22a6d2cae3acb4f920466712d.

    Merged code-side preparation:

    Prepared and not merged:

    Hosted validation remains unavailable: latest retries for PR #87 and PR #88 again created Build/Image jobs with zero executed steps, so they provide neither code pass nor code failure evidence.

    Remaining RC1 blockers are now predominantly evidence/governance/owner decisions rather than product feature implementation: #29 runtime Compose proof, #49 branch protection/review enforcement, #60 external sender/mailbox/DNS QA, #61 operational infrastructure evidence, #62 legal/identity decisions and qualified review, #63 support-route decisions/proof, then #70 exact-artifact approval package.

    No deployment, production migration, DNS/provider purchase/configuration, policy publication, participant communication, billing, or repository protection change was performed.

  5. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 integration checkpoint (2026-09-04): the preparation PR sequence is now fully merged through current main a09a91ac1ff90da23f3c12c397858ec0a460cd03.

    Merged preparation:

    The roadmap is now evidence/decision-bound rather than implementation-bound. Remaining P0 work is real runtime/external/governance proof for #29, #49, #60, #61, #62, #63, then #70. Fresh hosted CI on the final main SHA still fails before checkout with zero executed steps, so no release validation is inferred. Adaptive Planning remains post-RC1 and should not expand the frozen release candidate.

  6. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    Roadmap integration review — 2026-09-04

    Current RC1 code line is now main @ 0c05e7037b5d07029401aad2d6515ef6c243a08c.

    Merged as release-safe maintenance:

    Reviewed and intentionally excluded from RC1:

    The open PR queue now contains only that deferred #79 feature PR. RC1 should remain frozen at the current integrated line except for evidence-driven release/trust fixes.

  7. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 owner-decision packet — current candidate 0c05e7037b5d07029401aad2d6515ef6c243a08c

    All code-side RC1 preparation is integrated. The remaining release work should now proceed as separate, narrowly scoped approvals/evidence gates rather than more feature implementation.

    A. #49 repository governance

    Recommended: protect main; require PRs, one qualified approval, CI Build / Build, stale-approval dismissal, no force push/delete. Keep image validation path-scoped rather than universally required.

    Approval scope if chosen: repository governance only. No deployment, production, DNS, billing, or customer impact.

    B. #29 disposable Compose proof

    Recommended: run the exact candidate only in an isolated non-production Docker environment, using disposable DB/uploads/outbox state. Prove migration, readiness, lifecycle, backup, restore, and cleanup. Customer impact: none; expected incremental cost: $0 CAD if using an already approved host.

    Approval scope if chosen: create/delete disposable containers, networks, volumes, database, and synthetic account data only. No production/public host mutation.

    C. #60 external authentication email

    Recommended: use the already implemented Resend adapter with a dedicated Synapse sender identity on an owner-approved domain/subdomain and only operator-controlled test mailboxes for QA. Verify SPF/DKIM/DMARC and rendered verification/reset journeys before any participant invite.

    Approval scope if chosen: provider/domain/mailbox configuration and operator-only test messages. Customer addresses/contact remain separately prohibited.

    D. #61 operations objectives

    Recommended beta defaults: RPO 24h; RTO 4h; daily encrypted off-site backups; 30-day retention subject to qualified policy review; alerts for unhealthy instance, elevated request errors, backup failure, disk >80%; one primary + one backup responder; no public SLA.

    Approval scope if chosen: these operating objectives only. Actual provisioning, backup upload, alert delivery, destructive restore, rollback, or production access remains action-time approval.

    E. #63 support model

    Recommended: one monitored email-based primary route; urgent access/data-loss/deletion/privacy path in the same monitored system with explicit urgent routing if desired; one primary + one backup responder; stated coverage hours/time zone; no SLA; both responders may pause the pilot on Sev 1.

    Approval scope if chosen: operating model only. Creating/publishing channels or contacting participants remains separate.

    F. #62 legal/data ownership

    No defaults should be inferred. Owner must explicitly provide: operating identity, jurisdiction, privacy owner/contact, copyright holder/year, host/data region, participant eligibility, and policy effective date. Qualified review must approve privacy/terms/retention/provider/AI/analytics/support wording before publication.

    P1 evidence gates

    #64 rendered browser QA; #65 comprehension/first-value testing; #66 five-user 14-day pilot; #67 approved-provider AI evaluation; #68 willingness-to-pay and observed economics. #69 remains post-beta and does not block the no-payment pilot.

    Rule

    Each approval is independent. Approval of one item must not be interpreted as approval of another, and none of the above by itself authorizes production deployment or public launch.

  8. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 dependency freeze — 2026-09-04

    Full open-PR audit complete.

    Frozen candidate remains 0c05e7037b5d07029401aad2d6515ef6c243a08c.

    Open PRs intentionally excluded from RC1:

    No other open pull requests exist. None of these should change the exact RC1 candidate before the beta decision unless a specific release-critical/security justification is documented and explicitly approved.

  9. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    2026-09-04 control-plane reconciliation prepared

    Documentation-only PR #94 now reconciles the repository control plane to this governing roadmap without changing application code, workflows, dependencies, infrastructure, or release behavior.

    PR #94 updates only:

    • PRODUCT.md — current RC1 product/evidence/release truth;
    • BACKLOG.md — current technical implementation/verification states;
    • README.md — canonical navigation and managed-beta boundary.

    It removes stale PR #55 / hosted-green-CI / obsolete dependency-PR claims and records the current baseline 0c05e7037b5d07029401aad2d6515ef6c243a08c, open RC1 evidence gates, post-beta billing, post-RC1 Adaptive Planning, and frozen dependency PRs #59/#72/#73.

    Effective diff is three documentation files only. PR #94 is reviewable and mergeable but remains unmerged. If it is eventually merged before final release freeze, #70 must bind release evidence to the resulting exact commit SHA rather than the older runtime baseline SHA.

    GitHub-hosted CI on #94 again failed before checkout with zero executed steps (steps:null), matching the existing hosted-runner incident rather than exposing a new application failure.

  10. camster91 commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    Repository-maintenance queue reconciliation — 2026-09-04

    New open draft PRs #91, #92, and #93 were reviewed after #94 merged. They are independent/divergent pre-#94 branches with overlapping environment/agent-contract scope; #93 also changes canonical CI. None is RC1 release-critical.

    RC1 disposition: keep all three draft and outside the current candidate b45170409543684a75579a13d7bdd6d8f8ffe8e8. Post-beta, reconcile them into one current-main repository-maintenance PR rather than merging competing contracts independently. This does not change the roadmap execution order; #29 remains next.

  11. camster91 commented on Sep 5, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 checkpoint — recovery correctness before #29 execution

    The roadmap remains at #29, but execution is temporarily held on focused recovery fix PR #95.

    Review found the current restore drill can reconcile ./uploads instead of the files just restored into RESTORE_UPLOAD_DIR. Because that can create false-positive restore evidence, #29 must not run against current candidate b45170409543684a75579a13d7bdd6d8f8ffe8e8 until #95 or an equivalent fix is accepted.

    PR #95 is intentionally narrow: restore/upload reconciliation correctness + static contract coverage only. No new product scope. If merged, refresh the exact RC1 repository SHA and continue the existing order: #29 → #49 → operations/email/policy/support → rendered/AI validation → pre-pilot readiness → #70 → #66 → #68 closeout.

  12. camster91 commented on Sep 5, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 owner-decision packet — prepared, not approved

    Once #95/#29/#49 are cleared, the remaining external gates can be unlocked from one explicit decision set. Nothing below is inferred or authorized by this comment.

    A. Managed-beta operations (#61)

    Recommended five-user defaults:

    • Host: owner-selected managed-beta host — decision still required.
    • Data region: decision required.
    • Backup: daily encrypted off-site, separate from app host.
    • Retention: 30 days unless qualified review changes it.
    • RPO: 24 hours.
    • RTO: 4 hours.
    • Alerts: unhealthy >2 min; request-error rate >1% for 5 min; backup failure; disk >80%.
    • Responders: one named primary + one named backup.
    • No public SLA.

    B. Authentication email (#60)

    Recommended default:

    • Provider: Resend (already implemented; changing provider creates new implementation scope).
    • Sender domain/subdomain: owner decision required.
    • Sender identity: owner decision required.
    • QA mailbox: operator-controlled test mailbox only.
    • Operator: named owner/operator required.
    • Spend ceiling: explicit CAD amount or $0 if existing approved plan permits required before configuration.
    • SPF/DKIM/DMARC must pass before participant use.

    C. Support/incident model (#63)

    Recommended five-user model:

    • Primary route: one monitored email-based support route.
    • Urgent access/data-loss/deletion/privacy route: same monitored system with an explicit urgent prefix is sufficient unless owner wants a separate route.
    • Primary responder: named person required.
    • Backup responder: named person required.
    • Coverage hours + time zone: owner decision required.
    • Pause authority: primary + backup responders for Sev 1.
    • No guaranteed response/resolution SLA.

    D. Legal/data decisions (#62)

    Must be explicitly supplied; do not infer from repo/profile history:

    1. operating / contracting identity;
    2. primary jurisdiction;
    3. privacy owner;
    4. participant-facing privacy contact;
    5. copyright holder;
    6. copyright year or range;
    7. approved host/provider + data region;
    8. approved email provider/domain;
    9. approved support/privacy routes;
    10. participant eligibility / minimum-age rule;
    11. approved retention, RPO and RTO;
    12. policy/version effective date.

    Qualified review and a separate publication approval remain required after these decisions.

    E. AI validation (#67)

    Before live provider evaluation:

    • provider/model;
    • test-data policy;
    • external prompt/data handling approval;
    • maximum approved spend;
    • whether task creation remains enabled if quality/safety threshold is missed.

    Suggested approval format

    When ready, Cameron can approve or edit the recommendations in one message, for example:

    Approve A defaults; Resend for B with [domain/sender/mailbox/operator/spend]; C with [routes/responders/hours/time zone]; D = [explicit legal/data answers]; E = [provider/model/data/spend].

    Even a completed decision packet does not authorize deployment, DNS changes, provider configuration, sending email, backup uploads, destructive restore/rollback, policy publication, participant outreach or AI spend. Those remain action-time gates.

  13. camster91 commented on Sep 5, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    RC1 governing-roadmap update — 2026-09-05

    The only current release-critical code PR is #95, now ready for review at exact head f8de3ee3180a455634a3261f82020675795e85fe.

    Evidence on that exact head:

    • Codex final review: no major issues;
    • Ashbi Local CI: passed;
    • GitGuardian: passed;
    • hosted CI Build / Build: zero-step infrastructure failure;
    • recovery review threads: resolved.

    Execution order remains:

    1. explicit owner merge decision for fix: reconcile restored upload target during recovery drill #95;
    2. rebind RC1 candidate to resulting main SHA;
    3. P0: Run production Compose image/database smoke and close configuration audit #29 disposable Docker/runtime/backup/restore evidence on that exact candidate;
    4. P0: Restore application validation for production dependency pull requests #49 governance/hosted-CI resolution and P0: Verify external email delivery and complete authentication journey QA #60–P1: Validate the complete customer lifecycle in rendered browser QA #64/P1: Run representative AI task-creation quality, safety, latency, and cost evaluation #67 trust/ops evidence;
    5. P1: Validate goals-to-today positioning and first-value comprehension #65/P1: Validate managed-beta pricing and sustainable unit economics #68 pre-pilot readiness;
    6. P0: Assemble exact-SHA release approval package and staged rollout #70 exact-artifact approval;
    7. P1: Run the five-user 14-day managed-beta validation pilot #66 five-user no-payment pilot;
    8. P1: Validate managed-beta pricing and sustainable unit economics #68 final economics conclusion;
    9. Post-beta: Implement approved billing, cancellation, and entitlement recovery #69 paid lifecycle only post-beta;
    10. Post-RC1: build the “My day changed” Adaptive Planning vertical slice #74–Post-RC1: verify mobile-first “My day changed” interaction #77/Post-RC1: verify truthful Todo effort, Today deferral, and bounded undo model #80 and PR Post-RC1: complete My day changed adaptive planning flow #79 remain post-RC1.

    No merge or external execution is authorized by this roadmap update.

  14. camster91 commented on Sep 6, 2026

    @camster91
    OwnerAuthor

    Roadmap checkpoint: current main remains b45170409543684a75579a13d7bdd6d8f8ffe8e8. The immediate RC1 code prerequisite, PR #95 exact head 1f0877757c79e16ebdc0b91b68f1ecf8059449c3, is now ready for merge review: manual Codex review is clean, Ashbi Local CI and GitGuardian passed, and all inline findings are resolved. Sequence remains: separate merge decision for #95 → establish new exact main → run #29 disposable runtime/backup/restore evidence → continue #49/#60–#68 → #70 approval → #66 pilot. No #29 runtime execution or release-artifact freeze should occur against the pre-#95 main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area:productPositioning and customer journeypriority:P0Release blockerroadmapPart of the authoritative market-leading roadmap

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions