CIBA in NR is problematic#110
Open
AxelNennker wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
CIBA defeats the purpose of NR
AxelNennker
requested review from
Masa8106,
eric-murray and
grgpapadopoulos
as code owners
grgpapadopoulos
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2026
Masa8106
reviewed
Jul 8, 2026
Masa8106
left a comment
Masa8106
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@AxelNennker, thanks for opening this PR.
Please let me have some time, e.g. by the next meeting, to review this internally.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CIBA defeats the purpose of NumberRecycling
What type of PR is this?
Add one of the following kinds:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Clarify that CIBA defeats the purpose of NumberRecycling
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #109