Update PTS645SM43SMTR92.kicad_mod - #1
Open
nonchip wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Sorry, centuries later... I usually tend to think that physically separated pins must have different numbering, even if they are the same electrically, I believe this way the schematic+pcb are more consistent... Thanks for the contribution! |
Author
|
well if they were the same it would make routing easier, because often you have a pulled button/etc along a whole rail/fill so it actually doesn't matter the orientation/placement that much (because one way or another you have at least one of the pins next to it), and kicad would handle that correctly if the pins are the same. this prevents schematics looking like this: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pins 1/2, 2/4 are actually the same and should be handled as such imho.