fix: replace Block-specific system prompt with generic default, make it configurable - #12
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…it configurable The hardcoded system prompt referenced Block, Cash App, Square, and Afterpay by name, which is inappropriate for a general-purpose open-source library. Replace with a generic prompt and expose reviewSystemPrompt in ServeOptions so downstream repos can inject their own org-specific context. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
delkc
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 23, 2026 17:20
nahiyankhan
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
The
review_contentLLM system prompt introduced in the previous PR was copied from a downstream Block-internal repo and hardcoded references to "Block (the fintech company behind Cash App, Square, Afterpay, and other products)". That content shouldn't be in a general-purpose open-source library.What
reviewSystemPrompt?: stringtoServeOptionsso downstream repos can inject their own org-specific context when callingserveMcp()Risk Assessment
Low — only affects the
review_contenttool's LLM behavior; no logic changes, just the prompt text and a new opt-in escape hatch.Generated with Claude Code