YOLO mode you can trust. An autonomous coding agent that manages its own context, asks the right questions, and proves its work.
Current AI coding agents get context management wrong. They run until the context window fills up, then try to recover with compaction — lossy summarization that throws away critical information mid-task. Human-in-the-loop checks are aimed at the wrong level: agents ask for permission on mechanics (file edits, shell commands) when what they should be probing for is directional feedback.
Kadmon is built on a different philosophy:
- Minimize token usage from the start. Delegate specialized subtasks to focused subagents with scoped context instead of stuffing everything into one session. Use persistent memory across sessions, not just within them.
- Hand off context gracefully. As a session grows, Kadmon plans handoff points — packaging completed work, decisions made, and open questions into a clean context for the next phase. No lossy compaction.
- Go fast on mechanics, go slow on direction. Kadmon doesn't ask "can I edit this file?" It asks "we could approach this as a refactor or a rewrite — here's the tradeoff, which direction do you want?" Agents should automate execution and surface strategic decisions.
Where Kadmon is going and how it gets there:
- VISION.md — the north star: reach state-of-the-art parity, then win on context management, confidence-gated autonomy, and verification-first trust.
- ROADMAP.md — the execution path, organized by capability horizons (parity and wedge tracks). No date estimates — sequencing, not calendars.
- docs/design/competitive-analysis.md — the SOTA landscape Kadmon is positioned against.
- docs/design/differentiators.md — the three differentiators grounded in actual components, with measurable success criteria.
npm install -g kadmonOr with pip:
pip install kadmonkadmon initThis walks you through provider setup once (globally — not per-project). Then in any project:
cd your-project
kadmonType your task, kadmon works, streams output as it goes. Ctrl+C to exit.
pip install --upgrade kadmonOr with npm:
npm update -g kadmonAnthropic:
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...
kadmon --provider anthropicOpenAI:
export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-...
kadmon --provider openaiGoogle Gemini:
export GOOGLE_API_KEY=...
kadmon --provider geminiAWS Bedrock:
export AWS_PROFILE=your-profile
export AWS_REGION=us-east-1
kadmon --provider bedrockConfig is saved to .kadmon/config.toml after kadmon init — you only set this up once.
Other agents are either fast-but-reckless (YOLO mode, guess and go) or safe-but-slow (approve every file write). Kadmon is neither. It's fully autonomous on mechanics — but asks you when it's genuinely uncertain about direction.
Kadmon never asks "can I edit this file?" or "should I run this test?" — it just does it. But when requirements are ambiguous, when a design could go two ways, when it's not sure what you actually want — it asks. This is what makes it trustworthy enough to run unsupervised.
Most agents degrade over long sessions. Context fills up with irrelevant tool outputs, the model starts looping, quality drops. You restart, lose everything, re-explain the task.
Kadmon detects this happening and handles it:
- Writes a focused handoff document (what's done, what's next, key pointers)
- Clears its own context
- Continues from the handoff — no human intervention needed
Kadmon maintains a project library (.kadmon/library/) that survives across sessions:
- Architecture notes, conventions, decisions — written by the agent, not by you
- Mechanical session logging captures everything (flight recorder)
- LLM-powered curation synthesizes raw logs into clean knowledge between sessions
- Cross-project session index so kadmon knows what you were working on yesterday
Made a wrong turn? Two escape hatches:
kadmon rewind— go back to before any recent prompt (conversation reset, files untouched)kadmon rollback— undo file changes to any checkpoint
The agent also uses checkpoints autonomously: edit → test → fail → rollback → try differently. No human intervention needed for routine recovery.
kadmon # Interactive chat (default)
kadmon continue # Resume previous task from where you left off
kadmon status # Show current session and library state
kadmon status --global # Show recent sessions across all projects
kadmon rewind # Rewind conversation to a previous prompt
kadmon rollback [id] # Rollback file changes to a checkpoint
kadmon checkpoints # List available file checkpoints
kadmon init # Interactive provider setup
kadmon run --task "..." # One-shot modekadmon/
├── agent/ # ReAct loop, planning, handoff, recovery
├── providers/ # LLM providers (Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini)
├── tools/ # file I/O, search, shell, plan, ask_human, library, checkpoints, parallel
├── memory/ # Library team (index/read/write/prune/curator agents), session log
├── human/ # Question batching, CLI/webhook channels
├── workers.py # Parallel task dispatch (ThreadPoolExecutor)
├── checkpoints.py # File-level snapshots for rollback
├── conversation.py # Conversation state for rewind
├── eval/ # Benchmark harnesses (Aider Polyglot, SWE-bench)
└── index/ # Tree-sitter symbol index (SQLite)
Key design:
- Architect/Editor phase separation — explore and plan first, then execute step by step
- Library Team — focused LLM subagents for on-demand context retrieval (not blob injection)
- Dual-layer persistence — mechanical capture (JSONL flight recorder) + intelligent curation (LLM synthesis)
- Autonomous handoff — detects context degradation, writes handoff, resets, continues
- Parallel workers — fan out independent subtasks to separate context windows
- No frameworks — provider SDKs directly, minimal core
- ask_human as a tool — always available for genuine uncertainty, never for permission
Kadmon optimizes for trust, not speed.
The bet: developers give more autonomy to an agent that asks "should this be REST or GraphQL?" before building the wrong thing — and then proves it works with passing tests — than to one that silently builds the wrong thing fast.
Trust compounds. An agent that asks good questions and verifies its work earns the right to run unsupervised on bigger tasks. An agent that guesses and sprints earns Ctrl+C.
git clone https://github.com/ayuan153/kadmon.git
cd kadmon
./dev./dev handles everything: creates a venv, installs dependencies, and launches kadmon from your local source.
./dev # Launch interactive kadmon (local build)
./dev bench # 5 Python exercises
./dev bench 20 # 20 exercises
./dev bench-full # All 225 exercises, 6 languages
./dev run "task" # One-shot mode
./dev test # Run tests
./dev lint # Run linter225 Exercism exercises across Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++.
kadmon bench --languages python --limit 5 # Quick smoke test
kadmon bench --languages python # Full Python
kadmon bench -j 10 # All languages, parallelkadmon eval --dataset swe_bench_verified_mini.json --limit 10See AGENTS.md for AI contribution guidelines. Key rules:
- Build → Lint → Test → Commit (no skipping)
- Conventional commits with scopes
- One concern per commit
./publish # patch: 0.4.0 → 0.4.1
./publish minor # minor: 0.4.1 → 0.5.0
./publish major # major: 0.5.0 → 1.0.0Bumps version, commits, tags, pushes. CI publishes to PyPI + npm automatically.
MIT