binding/occurrence: Resolve names in quoted expressions

[aviatesk]

References, rename, document highlights, and unused-import diagnostics could miss or misclassify identifiers inside quoted expressions. Generated arguments could also be confused with same-named inner bindings, producing incomplete references and unsafe rename edits.

Introduce a shared inert resolver for target selection and occurrence collection. Code-shaped ordinary quotes resolve in their construction module, macro quotes in definition scope, and generated bodies in a synthetic function scope with exact argument remapping. Direct interpolation remains in its enclosing lexical scope, while nested generated-output interpolation follows its corresponding quote stage.

Track quote and interpolation stages when classifying nested macrocalls. Support one-argument @eval in bare and Base.@eval forms, @generated and Base.@generated, and direct esc(...) or Base.esc(...) boundaries. Two-argument @eval and escaped free names remain unresolved.

This intentionally uses a pragmatic construction-site approximation. Atomic Symbol flow, indirect escape flow, nested quoted values inside @eval, general qualified or aliased new-style macro resolution, and confidence-aware filtering of generated temporary expressions remain future work.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.85057% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 78.59%. Comparing base (5880856) to head (74bee1f).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/utils/binding.jl	98.39%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #801      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.29%   78.59%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files          62       62              
  Lines       13257    13398     +141     
==========================================
+ Hits        10379    10530     +151     
+ Misses       2878     2868      -10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
JETLS.jl	78.59% <98.85%> (+0.30%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.