feat: support for service_ids in transfers.txt - #74
Closed
aubryio wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
aubryio
force-pushed
the
feat/transfers-serviceids
branch
from
July 24, 2026 18:54
29f0baf to
bc6f84a
Compare
Owner
Author
|
(merged in d8e5fbd) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Swiss GTFS now uses a non-standard extension to model transfers valid only for specific dates. See https://opentransportdata.swiss/en/cookbook/timetable-cookbook/gtfs/gtfs-changes-transfers-txt/
In our case the implementation is fairly straightforward, and it does solve a few missing transfers that were only present in HRDF before.
See also google/transit#595