control-surface

Reusable control-surface workflow assets for ASK projects.

Current default: single-node Claude Code as both control surface and executor. Legacy: Model A split execution is retained only for projects that explicitly need it.

This repo contains both the live operating files for control-surface itself and reusable workflow artifacts for downstream ASK projects, including the upstream instantiation phase before a target repo exists.

Start Here // Instantiate a New ASK Project

To start a new ASK project from this protocol repo, beginning from zero:

1. Create a new GitHub repo for the target ASK project.

   Repo pattern:

   apexSolarKiss/<project-name>
   

   Example:

   apexSolarKiss/new-working-example-ASK
   

2. Clone the new repo to the local ASK workspace.

3. Create the repo-external project folder beside the repo:

   <project-name>-EXTERNAL/
     <project-name>_grounding-note.md   # canonical durable context (root)
     scratch/                            # _vN snapshots + iteration
     sources of intent/                  # inbound -TBI handoffs + received records
   

   Root is the default durable-context layer of an *-EXTERNAL surface; named semantic or structural layers (scratch/, sources of intent/) override it only where explicitly defined.

4. Instantiate the grounding note from templates/grounding-note.template.md. The canonical durable-context note lives at the *-EXTERNAL root; its versioned snapshots live in scratch/:

   <project-name>-EXTERNAL/<project-name>_grounding-note.md          # canonical (root)
   <project-name>-EXTERNAL/scratch/<project-name>_grounding-note_v1.md
   

   The canonical unversioned mirror should equal v1, and both carry their version in the first H1 as // v1.

5. Copy and adapt the repo-local starter files into the new repo:

   templates/AGENTS.template.md       → AGENTS.md
   templates/architecture.template.md → docs/architecture.md
   templates/CLAUDE.template.md       → CLAUDE.md
   

   For a new worked example, treat docs/architecture.md as default rather than optional.

6. Create a minimal README.md for the new repo if one does not already exist.

7. Use prompts/claude-code-initial-prompt.md to attach Claude Code to the new repo and begin bootstrap.

8. (Optional) When an external advisor surface is used:

   • Create the source index from templates/_INDEX-project.template.md as <project-name>-EXTERNAL/_INDEX-<project-name>.md (or _INDEX-<project-name>-<role>.md per role), and mount that index as the advisor Project's primary Source — mount the map, not copies of the canonicals; the advisor fetches canonicals live from Dropbox by exact path.
   • Adapt templates/advisor-project-instructions.template.md and install it once into the advisor Project Instructions — not pasted per thread (see docs/critique-protocol.md); the instructions point at the mounted index as the first read. The grounding note itself lives at the -EXTERNAL root.

9. (Optional) When the project will use the advisor / nudge / critique surfaces, adapt the protocol repo's reusable nudge and critique prompts into project-flavored operator-side copies in <project-name>-EXTERNAL/sources of intent/:

   prompts/repo-nudge-prompt.md              → <project-name>_repo-nudge-prompt.md
   prompts/repo-critique-initial-prompt.md   → <project-name>_repo-critique-initial-prompt.md
   prompts/repo-critique-synthesis-prompt.md → <project-name>_repo-critique-synthesis-prompt.md
   prompts/repo-critique-execution-prompt.md → <project-name>_repo-critique-execution-prompt.md
   

   The protocol repo's prompts remain canonical reusable sources; the operator-side copies are project-flavored adaptations so the advisor and control surfaces can operate without re-deriving prompt language each time. Adapt only the prompts the project will actually use.

   System-wide ecology critique prompts live separately at the meta level only — they are not adapted into downstream-project operator-side copies:

   prompts/ecology-critique-initial-prompt.md
   prompts/ecology-critique-synthesis-prompt.md
   prompts/ecology-critique-execution-prompt.md
   

   These are for system-wide critique across control-surface, method-ASK, design-system-ASK, and relevant downstream repos / grounding notes — not ordinary downstream-project critique.

10. Once bootstrap begins, the new repo's AGENTS.md governs execution.

Default operating model: single-node Claude Code as both control surface and executor. Legacy Model A prompts are retained only for projects that explicitly need that older split.

For deeper context on the three phases (Instantiation → Bootstrap → Operational), see docs/project-instantiation-workflow.md.

Operating Model

The active operating model for new ASK projects is single-node: Claude Code as both control surface and executor. An advisor in chat-based form — typically GPT or Claude — remains available outside the execution thread.

An earlier split-execution model — ChatGPT as prompt compiler, Codex as executor, Claude Code as optional advisor — shaped this repo's design and is retained as legacy reference. It is referred to historically as Model A. The Model-A-specific external orchestration artifact (control-surface.md) and Model-A-only prompts remain in the repo as legacy.

apexSolarKiss/mazeASK is still operated on Model A and is the working example for any project that still needs it. New ASK projects should default to single-node.

The workflow rules live in repo-local AGENTS.md files and are written agent-agnostically — they apply to whoever is executing.

Three live working examples anchor the family:

• apexSolarKiss/asset-pipeline-ASK — mature single-node working example and primary pressure surface from which the protocol repo's rules are discovered, and source of upstream workflow-rule evolution. Operated end-to-end on Claude Code as control surface and executor; has produced the most advanced live AGENTS.md in the family. Template changes absorb only the portions that generalize beyond that repo's domain.
• apexSolarKiss/urban-observatory — second single-node working example. Newer project, currently in early bootstrap and prototype-planning phase. Pressures the protocol repo at the source-of-intent recovery, post-bootstrap grounding-note freshness, and architecture-uncertain instantiation surfaces.
• apexSolarKiss/mazeASK — Model A working example. Operated on the ChatGPT/Codex split; the original concrete instance the boundary model was sketched against. Still active for that project.

Source-of-Truth Split

ASK project work uses three durable sources of truth plus operator-side ephemeral memory:

• Repo = project state (artifacts, decisions, current navigation)
• AGENTS.md (in-repo) = workflow rules, agent-agnostic, applies to whoever executes
• Grounding note (external) = repo-external context: intent, audience, philosophy, foundational premises, durable loose threads
• Per-conversation memory (operator-side: Claude Code's MEMORY.md, ChatGPT thread history, task lists) = ephemeral session state, does not flow into the durable sources

Aging-Rate Principle

The split is not just separation of concerns. It is separation by aging rate:

• A doc that tracks state ages fast and must be refreshed often.
• A doc that points to state ages slowly and stays useful across many sessions.
• A rules doc that contains rules only ages slowly.
• A context doc that contains context only ages slowly.
• A doc that mixes rules, context, and state ages at the rate of its fastest-aging contents.

This is the load-bearing rationale for the source-of-truth split. Each source is sized to a single aging rate.

Repo Layout

Live operating files for this repo

• AGENTS.md — repo-local workflow rules that govern execution inside this repo
• CLAUDE.md — pointer to AGENTS.md for Claude Code operators
• docs/architecture.md — meta architecture of this repo and the role model behind it

Methodology docs

• docs/method.md — compact bridge pointing to apexSolarKiss/method-ASK as the upstream methodology layer; substantive method articulation now lives in method-ASK/docs/method.md

Workflow docs

• docs/project-instantiation-workflow.md — agent-agnostic workflow doc for the pre-repo instantiation phase before a target ASK repo exists
• docs/critique-protocol.md — how a fresh-context critique is instantiated (two mechanics by executor type), how the advisor surface is bootstrapped (Project Instructions, not a per-thread paste), the coverage-band requirement, and the non-repo package-availability rule

Reusable templates for downstream ASK repos

• templates/AGENTS.template.md — agent-agnostic starter for repo-local execution rules; derived from the shared workflow core of asset-pipeline-ASK's live AGENTS.md (project-specific architecture rules in that repo are not absorbed by default)
• templates/grounding-note.template.md — starter for the external grounding note that travels with each ASK project
• templates/architecture.template.md — starter for a downstream repo's architecture doc
• templates/CLAUDE.template.md — optional Claude Code pointer file for downstream single-node repos
• templates/advisor-project-instructions.template.md — the advisor bootstrap (role + fail-closed read-path) for an external advisor surface (GPT or Claude in chat form); adapted per project and installed once into the advisor Project Instructions, not pasted per thread (see docs/critique-protocol.md)
• templates/_INDEX-project.template.md — the source index / path map an advisor Project mounts as its primary Source; instantiated as <project>-EXTERNAL/_INDEX-<project>.md (or _INDEX-<project>-<role>.md per role). Mount the map, not copies of the canonicals — the advisor fetches canonicals live from Dropbox by exact path; mounted copies are fallback only
• templates/overlays/architecture-uncertain-rules.template.md — optional opt-in overlay for downstream projects with active architecture or ontology uncertainty; adds rules calibrated for projects whose work is to discover structural categories (architecture-before-prototype, prototype-as-pressure-surface, attempt-model-before-plan, self-evident-premise stop, ceremony budget, proof-chain gravity well guard, bootstrap doc-alignment check) on top of the base template; not used by projects whose task surface is known

Templates are copyable starters. They are not live for this repo unless explicitly adopted somewhere else.

Prompts

• prompts/project-instantiation-initial-prompt.md — agent-agnostic startup prompt for the pre-repo instantiation phase
• prompts/claude-code-initial-prompt.md — session-start prompt for attaching Claude Code to an existing single-node project repo
• prompts/repo-nudge-prompt.md — lightweight boundary nudge at local plateaus / absorptions / unclear next moves; single open-ended question anchored against the grounding note
• prompts/repo-critique-initial-prompt.md — open-ended structural critique against repo + grounding note (initial pass of the fresh-context critique cycle)
• prompts/repo-critique-synthesis-prompt.md — advisor-role synthesis of two independent critiques into an advisory plan (synthesis pass)
• prompts/repo-critique-execution-prompt.md — hand the advisory plan back to the execution surface for scoped implementation (execution pass)
• prompts/ecology-critique-initial-prompt.md — open-ended fresh-context critique across the ASK system-building ecology (control-surface, method-ASK, design-system-ASK, downstream repos / grounding notes)
• prompts/ecology-critique-synthesis-prompt.md — fold another independent ecology critique into the one just produced and make an advisory plan
• prompts/ecology-critique-execution-prompt.md — hand the ecology advisory synthesis back to the execution surface for per-repo scoped implementation, stopping at exact scoped diff (execution pass)

Examples

• examples/asset-pipeline-ASK/notes.md — single-node working example (mature pressure surface)
• examples/urban-observatory/notes.md — single-node working example (newer; instantiation / source-of-intent recovery pressure surface)
• examples/mazeASK/notes.md — Model A working example (still active for that project)

Legacy docs

These were active when the canonical operating model was ASK→ChatGPT→Codex with Claude Code as advisory. They are retained for reference and for apexSolarKiss/mazeASK, which still runs on Model A.

• control-surface.md — Model-A-specific external control-surface artifact
• docs/workflow-boundary.md — earlier boundary categorization, supplanted by AGENTS.md's Source-of-Truth Boundaries section
• prompts/control-surface-initial-prompt.md — Model-A ChatGPT-side initial prompt
• prompts/codex-initial-prompt.txt — Model-A Codex-side initial prompt

Each legacy doc carries a deprecation header naming what supersedes it for current single-node work.

Which File Do I Use?

If you need to...	Use
define execution rules inside the current repo	AGENTS.md
understand this protocol repo's own architecture	docs/architecture.md
set up the workflow before the target repo exists	docs/project-instantiation-workflow.md and prompts/project-instantiation-initial-prompt.md
attach Claude Code to an existing single-node repo	prompts/claude-code-initial-prompt.md
attach an external advisor surface (GPT or Claude in chat form) to an existing repo	templates/advisor-project-instructions.template.md + templates/_INDEX-project.template.md (mount the index as the primary Source)
create repo-local starter docs for a downstream repo	templates/AGENTS.template.md, templates/grounding-note.template.md, templates/architecture.template.md, templates/CLAUDE.template.md
see how the structure mapped onto a real ASK project	examples/
understand the previous canonical Model-A operating doc	control-surface.md (legacy)

Minimal Adaptation Checklist

For a new ASK project:

• Identify the project purpose, repo name, and initial structure.
• Default to the single-node operating model unless the project has a specific reason to run on legacy Model A.
• Copy templates/AGENTS.template.md into the new repo as AGENTS.md and adapt project-specific defaults.
• Copy templates/grounding-note.template.md into the external grounding-note location and fill in intent, audience, philosophy, foundational premises, and durable loose threads.
• Optionally copy templates/architecture.template.md into the new repo as docs/architecture.md.
• Optionally copy templates/CLAUDE.template.md into the new repo as CLAUDE.md when using Claude Code.
• Optionally adopt templates/overlays/architecture-uncertain-rules.template.md when the project profile is architecture-uncertain (ontology-first work, prototypes as pressure surfaces, deferred schema commitment, modeling-before-planning). Append after the base AGENTS.md rules; skip when the task surface is known and the work is execution against it.
• Identify protected paths, constraints, and required verification steps in the new repo's AGENTS.md.
• Use prompts/claude-code-initial-prompt.md to attach Claude Code after the repo exists.
• Optionally adapt templates/advisor-project-instructions.template.md and install it once into the advisor Project Instructions when an external advisor surface is used (see docs/critique-protocol.md); alongside it, create <project>-EXTERNAL/_INDEX-<project>.md from templates/_INDEX-project.template.md and mount that index as the Project's primary Source (the map, not copies of the canonicals).
• Optionally adapt the protocol repo's nudge prompt (prompts/repo-nudge-prompt.md) and critique-cycle prompts (prompts/repo-critique-initial-prompt.md, prompts/repo-critique-synthesis-prompt.md, prompts/repo-critique-execution-prompt.md) into project-flavored operator-side copies in <project-name>-EXTERNAL/sources of intent/ when those surfaces will be used.

Background Reading

The control-surface design is anchored to a short execution-protocol subset of the broader ASK workflow / method article line. The full chronological article index lives upstream in method-ASK/docs/articles.md.

• Beyond Vibe Coding: Constraining LLMs — the case for constrained LLMs and explicit rules; substrate for the discipline this repo operationalizes.
• Lessons from the First Prototype Phase — the structural retrospective; calibrated compensations for what single-node collapses relative to the legacy split.
• Adversarial Collaboration — the within-session multi-mind layer; the pattern behind this repo's two review windows and per-PR cadence.
• From Conversation to Control Surface — project inception from messy AI-mediated exploration; the recovered intent → validated constraint → repo sequence.
• Three Agents Got Into an Argument // The Repo Won — the repo-as-arbiter operating rule: artifact-owning surface gets the final read on current file contents.

License

Copyright 2026 Andrew S Klug // ASK

Licensed under the Apache License 2.0 // see LICENSE