Skip to content

Fix typo in ssvm check script#8191

Merged
DaanHoogland merged 2 commits into
apache:4.18from
storpool:fix-typo
Nov 24, 2023
Merged

Fix typo in ssvm check script#8191
DaanHoogland merged 2 commits into
apache:4.18from
storpool:fix-typo

Conversation

@slavkap

@slavkap slavkap commented Nov 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR fixes a typo, which causes an incorrect check for the NFS connection.

ERROR: Storage nfs is not currently mounted
Verifying if we can at least ping the storage
Storage address is empty, trying to ping storage network gateway instead ()
ping: missing host operand
Try 'ping --help' or 'ping --usage' for more information.
WARNING: Cannot ping nfs storage network gateway

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI

@yadvr yadvr left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - didn't check/test

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

Comment thread systemvm/agent/scripts/ssvm-check.sh Outdated
@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #8191 (63199dd) into 4.18 (e6f048b) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.18    #8191      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     13.07%   13.07%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     9111     9110       -1     
============================================
  Files          2720     2720              
  Lines        257597   257597              
  Branches      40160    40160              
============================================
- Hits          33680    33671       -9     
- Misses       219682   219692      +10     
+ Partials       4235     4234       -1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today!

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 7661

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@slavkap I try to validate your PR but don't see the error on 4.18-HEAD
image

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

but I got exactly the same output with it so at least no regression:
image

can you expand on why you have this issue @slavkap ? mine seems to silently fail (or not fail at all????)

@slavkap

slavkap commented Nov 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@DaanHoogland, I'm having this issue when there is a problem with the NFS, and it's not mounted.

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DaanHoogland, I'm having this issue when there is a problem with the NFS, and it's not mounted.

of course :headbang:

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[LL]Trillian test result (tid-6887)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x1), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 40150 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr8191-t6887-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 104 look OK, 5 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup Error 35.44 test_affinity_groups.py
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project Error 71.37 test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_01_non_strict_host_anti_affinity Failure 100.37 test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py
test_02_non_strict_host_affinity Error 77.92 test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py
test_02_upgrade_kubernetes_cluster Failure 3925.07 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster Failure 206.65 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_07_deploy_kubernetes_ha_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_08_upgrade_kubernetes_ha_cluster Failure 0.03 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_09_delete_kubernetes_ha_cluster Failure 0.03 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_hostha_enable_ha_when_host_in_maintenance Error 305.69 test_hostha_kvm.py

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code change LGTM

@shwstppr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 7814

@shwstppr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-8388)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 54459 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr8191-t8388-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 108 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_01_invalid_upgrade_kubernetes_cluster Failure 3616.30 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_02_upgrade_kubernetes_cluster Failure 3615.55 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_04_autoscale_kubernetes_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_05_basic_lifecycle_kubernetes_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_06_delete_kubernetes_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_07_deploy_kubernetes_ha_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_08_upgrade_kubernetes_ha_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_09_delete_kubernetes_ha_cluster Failure 0.04 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_10_vpc_tier_kubernetes_cluster Failure 47.70 test_kubernetes_clusters.py
ContextSuite context=TestKubernetesCluster>:teardown Error 98.89 test_kubernetes_clusters.py

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland merged commit 8f39087 into apache:4.18 Nov 24, 2023
dhslove pushed a commit to ablecloud-team/ablestack-cloud that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants