Record verifiable demo run manifests - #15
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
reports/sample_run_manifest.jsonafter every successful demo runWhy
The demo produced useful artifacts but no machine-readable record tying them
to the exact configuration and runtime that created them. Saved outputs were
therefore difficult to audit or compare later.
User impact
Every demo output directory is now self-describing. Users can inspect the
effective run configuration and independently verify that artifacts have not
changed.
Validation
python -m ruff check src tests streamlit_app.pypython -m pytest -q(66 passed)python -m compileall -q src tests streamlit_app.pypython -m build