Add sealed chronological test evaluation#13
Merged
Conversation
almondsun
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 13, 2026 06:46
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
Milestone 025 selected ByteBPE512 using validation evidence. This change creates a clearer information boundary and evaluates that frozen decision once on terminal held-out segments, without breaking existing two-way configurations.
Result
ByteBPE512 beats character test BPC by 0.0614 on Alice and 0.0258 on Peter Pan. All four test BPC values are worse than validation, so the report treats the terminal segments as consumed evidence and does not use them for further tuning.
Validation
make PYTHON=.venv/bin/python check— 163 tests, 91.00% coveragemake PYTHON=.venv/bin/python audit— no known vulnerabilitiesgit diff --check