aicg: learning_gap — lessons#1
Conversation
JoshuaAFerguson
deleted the
aicg/2026-07-09/rag-engineer-learning/learning-empty-module-container-lessons
branch
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2fddafba73
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| - Define retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in the terms the original paper introduced it. | ||
| - Distinguish parametric knowledge (weights) from non-parametric knowledge (an external corpus). | ||
| - Name the four stages of a minimal RAG pipeline — **ingest → chunk → embed → retrieve → generate** — and explain what each stage owns. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The module overview says learners should name the “four stages” but immediately lists five stages, and the lecture/quiz also teach the pipeline as five stages. Because this is a learning objective in the module entry point, the mismatch can leave learners with the wrong core vocabulary before they start the lesson.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
AICG cross-repo audit work item
learning_gap/?learning-empty-module-container-lessonsrag-engineer-learninglessonsWhy
lessons contains no mod-* directories.
Loop note
Generated by the autonomous runner. CI must pass.