Six methods for analyzing the completeness of seismic data, of course based on catalogs, without involving the completeness assessment related to station detection
These methods are the most commonly used, and you can explore the functions by inputting different parameters. Recently, some Mc calculation methods designed for different directories have also emerged; you may read relevant literature to find the ones best suited to your needs.
Refer to:
Wiemer, S., & Wyss, M. (2000). Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(4), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990114
Woessner, J., & Wiemer, S. (2005). Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95, 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040007
Zhuang, J., Ogata, Y., & Wang, T. (2017). Data completeness of the Kumamoto earthquake sequence in the JMA catalog and its influence on the estimation of the ETAS parameters. Earth, Planets and Space, 69(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0614-6
