feat(lattices): prove the Hachi subfield factor swap - #698
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Aristotle (Harmonic) <aristotle-harmonic@harmonic.fun>
🤖 PR Summary
The Hachi Lemma 5 formalization is now complete. The final gap—proving that an irreducible factor Statistics
Lean Declarations ✏️ Added: 2 declaration(s)
✅ Removed: 1 `sorry`(s)
📋 **Additional Analysis**The diff fills the final sorry (no_selfReciprocal_factor), rewrites the Status section from "open for contribution" to "complete", removes all sorry references from the module docstring and the Blueprint TeX, and updates commentary accordingly. Violation of the naming convention for The theorem name contains the string The auxiliary theorem Summary of Violations:
No other violations of the supplied instructions were found. 📄 **Per-File Summaries**
Last updated: 2026-08-30 08:27 UTC. |
Build Timing Report
Incremental Rebuild Signal
This compares a clean project build against an incremental rebuild in the same CI job; it is a lightweight variability signal, not a full cross-run benchmark. Slowest Current Clean-Build FilesShowing 20 slowest current targets, with comparison against the selected baseline when available.
|
PR Review findings1. Moderate: Update the canonical Hachi status documentationThe proof is complete, but the subfield landing page still lists Why it matters: Contributors who use the blueprint or landing page will think the main Hachi subfield theorem remains open. The documentation dependency status is also wrong. Required correction: Add 2. Low: Fix the PR title and add a descriptionThe title, Required correction: A suitable title is 3. Low: Clean up the added formattingThere are four consecutive blank lines. Several added lines exceed the repository's 100 character guideline. Required correction: Remove the extra blank lines and wrap the long lines. Specification alignment
I found no mathematical correctness issue. The proof establishes the root order, computes the extension degree, identifies the roots as a Frobenius orbit, and obtains the required contradiction if the inverse root belongs to that orbit. I found no circular dependency or bad edge case at Residual risks and unverified surfacesI could not independently run The website job is currently failing because of unrelated missing blueprint declarations. The Lean build and all other checks pass. Deslop and abstraction reviewEarned abstractions
Unnecessary or overgrown abstractionsI found none. Reviewed exact head |
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: MrBrain295 <66077254+MrBrain295@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@quangvdao is this good to merge now? |
No description provided.