[ADD] OD-1996 zpl format labels in using paazl as carrier.

[benrazanskas]

No description provided.

[benrazanskas]

Anyone knows why label format is being pop up in vanmoof_shipping? In that case, we will get pdf format at all times, since it's default even without providing such keyword. So the only step that is still blocking us from getting true .zpl format is this part.
https://github.com/VanMoof/odoo-addons/blob/12.0/vanmoof_shipping/models/stock_picking.py#L460
But thats in vamoof part ofc, not with OCA updates.

[StefanRijnhart]

Anyone knows why label format is being pop up in vanmoof_shipping? In that case, we will get pdf format at all times, since it's default even without providing such keyword. So the only step that is still blocking us from getting true .zpl format is this part. https://github.com/VanMoof/odoo-addons/blob/12.0/vanmoof_shipping/models/stock_picking.py#L460 But thats in vamoof part ofc, not with OCA updates.

Good find! Maybe @astirpe knows? (https://github.com/VanMoof/odoo-addons/commit/4fd8d6e62dc82833557c9ba84a8cdc20e2838af8)

[astirpe]

I can't remember anymore the reason of https://github.com/VanMoof/odoo-addons/commit/4fd8d6e62dc82833557c9ba84a8cdc20e2838af8 but now labelFormat is needed so the pop line should be removed

[benrazanskas]

I can't remember anymore the reason of VanMoof/odoo-addons@4fd8d6e but now labelFormat is needed so the pop line should be removed

Thanks for information will remove pop line with vanmoof commit then, after this part gets approved to our branch.

[StefanRijnhart]

Thanks for the updates so far! Given that we'd like this to go into the OCA, can you document this new option under https://github.com/OCA/delivery-carrier/blob/12.0/delivery_carrier_label_paazl/readme/CONFIGURE.rst?

[MPishpecki]

@benrazanskas what is the status of this PR. I see Stefan was last to comment but I see no changes after.

[benrazanskas]

@benrazanskas what is the status of this PR. I see Stefan was last to comment but I see no changes after.

@MPishpecki I have last update regards Stefan comment locally, wanted to ask, do I need to rebase and push this branch as new one, like we did before using Holger rebase script? Cuz this PR wasn't closed as my previous ones.

[StefanRijnhart]

Thanks! We now need a branch against VanMoof/odoo-addons that adds this branch as a merge branch under https://github.com/VanMoof/odoo-addons/blob/12.0/buildout.cfg#L163

[StefanRijnhart]

Thanks! We now need a branch against VanMoof/odoo-addons that adds this branch as a merge branch under https://github.com/VanMoof/odoo-addons/blob/12.0/buildout.cfg#L163

Will you create such a branch, so we can see what the tests do?

[benrazanskas]

Thanks! We now need a branch against VanMoof/odoo-addons that adds this branch as a merge branch under https://github.com/VanMoof/odoo-addons/blob/12.0/buildout.cfg#L163

Will you create such a branch, so we can see what the tests do?

Sorry for lately response, on Friday there was public holiday in Lithuania :) Created in here OD-1996,

[antonioburic]

Nice work @benrazanskas, are you able to raise an OCA PR or shall we do it?

[pankk]

Stale upstream, but were are using the code. Due to a conflict this PR was merged into: #8