10ms ws drain; ignore output_set#166
Closed
sastraxi wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This was referenced Jun 6, 2026
# Conflicts: # pistomp/handler.py
This was referenced Jun 6, 2026
rreichenbach
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2026
Collaborator
Author
|
Already merged; included in #167 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Extracted a new method
poll_ws_messages()in handlers to process messages received by the WS thread. By doing so, we can call it more frequently and be more responsive to MOD-UI changes; now on the 10ms hot-loop.Ignore
output_setmessages for performance reasons. These are sent frequently and we do not depend on them.Branch stack
adddump sastraxi/pi-stomp#36