Repository navigation
Conversation
yuiyuiui
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 24, 2026 04:07
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Submission type and scope
Mathematical publication/reference update for scope review. This PR does not claim a complete finite-n solution, Lean formalization, an award, or first priority for the constant or node construction. The catalog remains Open, Lean proof: No, Eligible to claim: No.
Problem
For the original unit-cardinal ordinary-dx functional, let m_n be its infimum over every n distinct real nodes in [-1,1]. The paper gives
It proves the corresponding arbitrary-node asymptotic lower bound and a matching sequence given by the actual roots of the Jacobi polynomial P_n^(-3/4,-3/4). It does not determine the exact minimum for every fixed finite n or classify finite-n minimizing configurations. Scope and statement correspondence are explicitly presented in the paper. Maintainer assessment of the appropriate catalog treatment is requested.
Prior work and related contribution
The coefficient-1 conjecture had already been publicly disproved. Formal Conjectures PR 4585 and its immutable public proof establish an eventual defect at least 106/105, while leaving the exact minimum and sharp limiting coefficient unresolved. This paper does not claim that disproof as a new contribution.
Brutman and Toledano's 1997 article, DOI 10.1016/S0898-1221(97)00232-0, numerically predicted the same leading digits 1.094219... by finite optimization and Richardson extrapolation (journal pp. 43–45, Eq. (28), Tables 1–2). The paper explicitly credits that prediction. The earlier article also introduced an explicit Average node set and conjectured its asymptotic optimality (pp. 46–47, Eqs. (33), (35)–(36)); that separate construction conjecture is not asserted here. Its general cardinal-square identity (Theorem 2.1, Eq. (7), pp. 39–40) is acknowledged at the related Hermite reduction.
The submitted paper supplies a rigorous sharp arbitrary-node asymptotic argument, an exact gamma expression and a matching actual Jacobi construction. The 1997 argument for the limiting coefficient is numerical/extrapolative; no sharp arbitrary-node proof or this Jacobi construction appears in its full body. No absolute first-priority claim is made for the present theorem, constant or node family.
Attribution and verification
Checks