Refactor: Use niquests rather requests - #2081
Draft
glensc wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
Seems both requests packages that we use have usage documented: |
This was referenced Oct 21, 2024
glensc
force-pushed
the
niquests
branch
3 times, most recently
from
October 22, 2024 20:17
3fc82e2 to
dfb1343
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
Some odd lockup happens:
i.e progressbar is stuck on first item on first library, but logs show it's processing items from next library. Update (2026-07-14) reported upstream: |
$ pipenv install niquests==3.20.1
$ pipenv requirements > requirements.txt
Collaborator
Author
requests cacheThere's niquests-cache available: doc: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To test this branch:
requests-cacherequests-oauthlib