docs: add TweetClaw OpenClaw memory workflow

[kriptoburak]

Summary:

• Add a README workflow for pairing Nemp with TweetClaw in OpenClaw.
• Show the OpenClaw install command and a safe Nemp memory example for public X/Twitter research.
• Note what not to store in Nemp: raw timelines, direct messages, API keys, and private account data.

Validation:

• git diff --check
• npm view @xquik/tweetclaw version --silent
• curl checks for TweetClaw GitHub and ClawHub links

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added guide for integrating TweetClaw plugin with Nemp, including workflow instructions and best practices for managing X/Twitter data safely.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@kriptoburak has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 52 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c46ba129-00b5-41f5-b4a7-d0aed20104cd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1acb6f1 and 17c382c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a new documentation section to the README explaining how to integrate the TweetClaw OpenClaw plugin with Nemp for managing X/Twitter data. The guide covers installation, recommended usage, and includes a concrete example showing how to save a reviewed summary instead of raw sensitive content.

Changes

TweetClaw Integration Guide

Layer / File(s)	Summary
TweetClaw integration documentation README.md	New section explains how to use TweetClaw to search, export, and monitor Twitter data, then save only reviewed summaries into Nemp while avoiding raw timelines, private data, and API keys.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops through tweets so fast,
With TweetClaw filtering past and past—
Only summaries saved, no secrets exposed,
Nemp remembers what wisdom composed! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'docs: add TweetClaw OpenClaw memory workflow' directly and specifically describes the main change: adding documentation about a TweetClaw OpenClaw memory workflow to the README.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[kilo-code-bot]

Kilo Code Review could not run — your account is out of credits.

Add credits or switch to a free model to enable reviews on this change.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 795-797: The fenced code block containing the command `/nemp:save
launch-feedback "TweetClaw search: query='openclaw plugin launch', saved 6 tweet
URLs, 3 objections, 2 follow-up ideas"` needs a language identifier; update the
block header from ``` to ```bash so the snippet is marked as bash (consistent
with other README examples and the markdown linter).
- Around line 785-800: Update the TweetClaw feature list for the
`@xquik/tweetclaw` README entry so it enumerates all supported capabilities: in
the sentence beginning "Use TweetClaw when an OpenClaw agent needs to..." add
posting tweets, posting tweet replies, scraping tweets, media upload, and
sending direct messages alongside the existing search, search tweet replies,
export followers, look up users, download media, monitor tweets, receive
webhooks, and run giveaway draws; keep the rest of the guidance about saving
only reviewed summaries to Nemp and preserving privacy (source tweet URLs/IDs,
capture date, short summary, next action) unchanged.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 31bd5b84-cd66-4972-9169-db5f41f8aaad

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f3e48a and 1acb6f1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md