Skip to content

feat(standard): reframe §3.2 concurrency as architecture-level concern — v1.30#9

Merged
UnbreakableMJ merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refine-p2-concurrency-v1.30
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

feat(standard): reframe §3.2 concurrency as architecture-level concern — v1.30#9
UnbreakableMJ merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refine-p2-concurrency-v1.30

Conversation

@UnbreakableMJ

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • §3.2 opens with the hardware rationale: modern CPUs universally provide multi-core/multi-thread capability; harnessing that concurrency is the primary performance lever
  • Concurrency is now framed as an architecture-level concern — considered from the ground up throughout design (data ownership, thread boundaries, sync points, parallelism opportunities identified at design time, not during optimization)
  • Adoption/abandonment conditions made explicit in a dedicated paragraph: adopt where it advances performance; abandon where it degrades performance (overhead, contention, serial workloads) or compromises Priority 1 (Stability)
  • Old first bullet ("designed-in from the start, never bolted on retroactively") promoted into the body — the architecture emphasis is stronger there
  • Compliance-checklist §3.2 bullet reworded to match

Test plan

  • makeinfo --no-split The_Steelbore_Standard.texi → zero errors, zero warnings ✓
  • grep "architecture" The_Steelbore_Standard.texi → hits in §3.2 body and checklist ✓
  • grep "abandoned" The_Steelbore_Standard.texi → hit in §3.2 adoption/abandonment paragraph ✓
  • grep "VERSION" The_Steelbore_Standard.texi1.30
  • The_Steelbore_Standard.md regenerated (1351 lines, §3.2 renders correctly) ✓

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…n — v1.30

Modern hardware universally provides multi-core/multi-thread capability;
§3.2 now opens with that hardware rationale as the "why" behind
concurrency-first design.  The section is restructured into two clear
paragraphs: (1) architecture mandate — concurrency considered from the
ground up throughout design, not bolted on at implementation; (2)
adoption/abandonment conditions — embrace concurrency where it advances
performance, abandon it where it degrades performance (overhead,
contention, serial workloads) or compromises Priority 1 (Stability).
The compliance-checklist §3.2 bullet is revised to match.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@UnbreakableMJ UnbreakableMJ merged commit 9faaa4e into main Jun 24, 2026
1 check passed
@UnbreakableMJ UnbreakableMJ deleted the refine-p2-concurrency-v1.30 branch June 24, 2026 07:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant